Discrepancy between "Terms of Service" and accessible content concerning "Prohibited content"

Due to very likely having to avoid certain keywords, I have to try to stay vague, but let's give it a try:

The terms of services state that "adult content" (which got very extensively defined there) is prohibited content. Yet at the same time there a countless models and pictures that clearly cater to certain interests. You could even make the point for a lot of merely PG-rated pictures that they match, if not easily succeed the low bar of "suggestive content". And that is not to mention the higher age ratings or even tags specifically made for those kinds of content - which at the same time are keywords the site does not want you to type into e.g. the searchbar.

Even beyond that: The automatic age rating seems rather inconsistent. I'd like to believe that some of my pics dabble into more mild fantasies, but sometimes had gotten inexplicably higher ratings - or got removed outright. And that is when they seem rather harmless compared to the very explicit and graphic content I had found on this site. Appealing to it seems ineffective, if not outright impossible in the first place. This (among other things) didn't really incentivise me to experiment or even share some of the generated works I had made.

While I'm concerned how long this article manages to be present, you're welcome to share your thoughts on the matter.

PS: I do not understand why an image is mandatory for any and all articles, including the likes of this one.