CivArchive
    Artius 2-1 NSFW - V1.0 VAE
    NSFW
    Preview 378502
    Preview 378501
    Preview 378547
    Preview 378500
    Preview 378499
    Preview 378548
    Preview 378497
    Preview 378496
    Preview 378494
    Preview 378493
    Preview 378492
    Preview 378491

    Artuis is a versatile and flexible model, it allows you to generate crisp, high-resolution images:

    This is a demo of NSFW capabilities of my model, you can check main model page in my models list.

    Keep in mind that this is an SD 2.1 768 model and its NSFW capabilities are limited compared to SD 1.5 models.

    To make unique faces, mix celebrity faces that the model knows: [emma stone : scarlett johansson : 0.5]

    If you liked my model, please leave a review, it helps other users to find this model and see its features!

    This is SD 2.1 based model, also I have SD 1.5 based version with more NSFW capabilities: https://civarchive.com/models/47691/artiusv1-5

    The model works best with the following samplers:
    Euler a
    DPM2
    DPM++ 2M Karras

    Optimal settings:
    Clip skip 1
    Eta noise seed delta: 31337
    DPM++ 2M Karras
    25 Steps
    CFG Scale 6
    Resolution from 768 (768, 1024, 1280)

    The model is prompt sensitive, so it depends on your imagination.
    I've generated some demo images, you can study the prompt and make your own based on them.

    Description

    N_S_F_W support

    Intergrated VAE

    Improved anatomy

    Improved sharpness

    Improved eyes

    FAQ

    Comments (22)

    BIG_AApr 1, 2023· 6 reactions
    CivitAI

    Gentlemen, The maker don't like to give girls a real cat. LOL~!

    VolatileSupernovaApr 1, 2023· 1 reaction

    I just came here to see if this was a non NSFW model and I had just forgot or something just to see all the boobs which confused me since I generated an image with accidental nudity but the woman was like a barbie doll below her waist and it was so weird lol

    nomonoApr 5, 2023

    SD 2.1 Bro

    BeefInjectorSep 18, 2023

    It's very difficult to get this model to generate a proper vagina. At first I thought it was adding some kind of icon to censor the vagina, but then I realized it was just very confused about how to render one.

    aleksml_84Apr 3, 2023· 8 reactions
    CivitAI

    Am I the only one withe the error?

    OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 9.00 GiB (GPU 0; 12.00 GiB total capacity; 2.07 GiB already allocated; 7.60 GiB free; 2.17 GiB reserved in total by PyTorch) If reserved memory is allocated memory try setting max_split_size_mb to avoid fragmentation. See documentation for Memory Management and PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF

    Time taken: 26.84s

    Torch active/reserved: 4286/7446 MiB, Sys VRAM: 11992/12288 MiB (97.59%)

    madPsykoApr 6, 2023· 3 reactions

    How running out of VRAM is related to this model ? lower your settings or get xformers.

    aleksml_84Apr 6, 2023

    @madPsyko I have no idea... works fine with other models, which settings should I lower? I do have xformers, here is the log from startup script:
    `Launching Web UI with arguments: --xformers --medvram`

    Mech4nimaLApr 6, 2023

    @aleksml_84 hi, try this:

    set PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=garbage_collection_threshold:0.9,max_split_size_mb:512

    aleksml_84Apr 6, 2023· 3 reactions

    @mech4nimal I tried it and had a different error, googled the error and it looks like I used some v1.5 embeddings which are not compatible with v2, thanks.

    yaode360276Jun 27, 2023

    it is said, 2.1 model needs a .yaml file,the author may forgot it

    Mech4nimaLApr 9, 2023· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    When I tested the same prompt I got the identical image both with this and the non-NSFW version of artiusv21. I'm not sure if used or did not use a VAE in either case (think not, none in file info mentioned). the only difference is that thenon-nfsw version output is sharper/more detailed.

    Mech4nimaLApr 9, 2023
    CivitAI

    Thanks for the Artius Models. They have great potential imo. What could be better: Hands, Eyes (seem often to have a kind of drawing style around the iris) and last - but not least - nipples ;D

    kaiboshMay 4, 2023
    CivitAI

    I don't get it... How is this a legit SD2.1 model? I thought the 2.1 stuff was 'off limits' as far as merging in NSFW? If this is possible why aren't there a dozen 2.1 models like this?

    sanchezvfx
    Author
    May 4, 2023

    Because this model is additionally tuned on the NSFW dataset

    7bleachMay 11, 2023
    CivitAI

    Hi Sanchez,

    Are you working on any updates to this model? This is by far the best one I've used until now, but there is one thing I dislike about it: it tends to make the faces too masculine, with a large forehead and pronounced cheekbones, straight brows etc. Other than that it is magnificent. Maybe you could point me on how to use negative prompts, because it seems to ignore (large forehead/big forehead), (masculine) etc. please.

    Thank you,

    Tibi

    DukeNukem47May 17, 2023

    ive seen that on many sd2.1 models hence why so few people use them. it seem they tend to make trans more. so you have to heavily throw tags into negative prompts to combat it. sd 1.5 is still way better with more freedom and more extras made by the community

    Have you experimented with inpainting using another model?

    7bleachMay 21, 2023

    @vegetarian_crocodile Yes, I have. Sometimes the results are credible, but most of the times you could tell there was a region "inpainted" over the original. I've managed to tame this model with some negative prompts, but more tinkering is needed.

    HV3Aug 11, 2023· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    think you meant to tag this as "NSFW" "Not Safe For Work"

    <thumbs up>

    DazzlingMazeMar 24, 2024

    lol, its tagged nswf, not safe work for

    A model that can generate only Females naked IS safe for work. Thats not real nsfw. come back to me when you have dicks then it would truly be nsfw.

    this softcore model of poses lol. boobs arent pornography.