Safetensors are un-supported in the webui, its either .pt or .bin currently

@eye_am_bored You are wrong on that, I am literally using a .safetensor embedding (EasyNegative) for over a month now.

This is a 18.9Kb file... what's the point optimizing something that small ?

@tetsuoo The reason is that, unlike a safetensors file, a pt file can contain malicious code that cannot be fully checked automatically.

@EG Thank you very much! ♥

You cant get pickled by an embed because there's no pickling lmao

@loktar Can you explain why in more detail?

If you really want to solve this problem you have to do it manually with controlnet

我也怀疑

It actually does.

I came here because I tested the few bad hands embeddings I had and this one won the comparison hands down. So, I came here to see if he's got more embeddings. He does. No, I didn't test them yet.

That said, not every embedding works well with every model or in combination with every other embedding. Always test what combo is best for the model you're using.

Eh most of these are placebo

They are gonna mess with the composition either way and might get you like 20% more gens with ok hands but it wont magically give you good hands every time or even every other time

@r6zhtfg that’s mainly due to the fact that AI-generated software doesn’t fully understand what the word “hand/hands” mean. Hands are super complex even for ai to render, so until that’s fixed, generating near perfect hands every outcome isn’t rlly possible, but at least w a LoRA like this it’s more likely.

@EG thx!

didn't work for me, still got mutated hands with 20 fingers. Ruined an image that otherwise looked good.

doesn't work for me. probably depends on what base model you're using.

@fablegenius go on my proficle and test my articles. those are shorter and work way better. this "collection was from my early days. won't delete it, because it still is useable for some people

Looking through your image history I see alot of bad hands...

@Enlinze lol!!! yes, because not every image had negative prompts on them. and, like you said, it's "history". i published already a lot of better prompts on my articles. you should take a look at them.

Don't you recommend using: "solid-best-physical-appearance-perfect::2"?

every time you write a comment you have something "better", you just keep spiting up random words

@elguachiiii yes, because i don't give up on testing new prompts. no one else here on civit does this. all they do is creating those shitty embeddings with a bunch of prompts that hopefully can generate something good, but not a single prompts that can do all of this together for the whole body.

@stapfschuh i never use negative embedings an usually keep negative promt short and just add specific negative if image is deformed, no universal ones

Interesting. Will have to test this.

I was actually kind of surprised this works as well as it does.

@sansmia visit my profile and read those articles i published. there are more ways/prompts for better images.

@Euge_  "i wont delete my last comment, everyone makes shitty embeddings, i leave up even the ones i want to delete for others" - signed, (deleted)

@Legend_of_Chavo_G after telling us to visit his page

Wow!