I remove sexy part (human) of cover so that cover without mature content can be counted in rank system.
The default micro bikini is not micro enough, So I made it a little bit smaller.
I try to make the older one compatiable with online generation service, but failed. Therefore I train a new one, with better areola.
Description
FAQ
Comments (6)
Why I use irrelevant covers is because only general covers count for the ranking system, and I'm vain.
And it f***ing works, LOL
This doesn't work great on realistic models, at least for me personally. I honestly can't even really tell how it works. Most of the time, at 0.1 strength, even sometimes at 0, it completely erases all traces of a bikini. Sometimes the bikini comes back (???) a little when you get to 1.0 strength, sometimes the strength just increases the bikini obliteration. Negative values don't seem to do much of anything to me. Maybe if there was a version of this that was like 1/100th the strength, maybe could get something out of it? Not sure, mostly just uncertain about how it functions.
oh yeah, sometimes it can be helpful in making other clothes skimpier, but when/how this decides to work is also a mystery to me.
Actually I don't really understand what you mean, if you need this effect then the weights should be turned up, 0.1 is too low. If you don't need it then don't apply this LoRA.
@buranj i have to agree with this user - on my realistic model, at a strength of 0.5, sometimes there is a full bikini, and other times there is no bikini at all, even with micro bikini and areola slip in the prompt
you should try update this one for illus version