These are simply a merged in version of SNOFS on top of Krea 2 Raw or Flux 2 Klein 9b Base or Distilled can't use lokrs for whatever reason, or want to train on top of them instead of the base model (so characters or styles come out well). I suppose you could also use them to generate on Civitai - if you want to run the Krea version as turbo on Civitai use one of the turbo extracted loras with it (and then CFG 1, 8 steps with Euler/Simple).
For full details on how best to use this model please check out the lokr page: https://civarchive.com/models/1972981/sex-nudes-other-fun-stuff-snofs
Both the lokr and this trained model are released under this license:
https://huggingface.co/Ashen3/SNOFS
Want to support my work or help fund the training of this dataset on other models? Join the Patreon in my profile, and if you do - thank you!
SNOFS Krea 1.3D bf16 and int8 convrot are both available as variants.
Description
FAQ
Comments (39)
edit/10? asking for friend :3
v1.4 fp8?
Optimal gen paramenters for 1.4?
FP8 please ))
just cast to fp8 on inference. Or is it the space?
FP8 is up. I noticed significant degradation when it comes to things like fingers, so I'd recommend the bf16 version if possible, at least on some images.
@Ashen3 is that true for base too? can we get fp8 for the base model? I have been finding that a base model + turbo is sometimes better than a distilled model.
Q8 quant works great btw
Why do I get such better results with distilled?
probably the more training that gets done to the base, the more the local turbo lora most people use will alter the outputs more. If you skip the turbo lora and increase steps base would probably still be better
Distilled models are tradeoffs. They're faster, but they're less flexible. If you are generating certain types of images they made end up better. Other types of images will end up worse. In Klein I've noticed the number of fingers it makes on a hand really struggle on the distilled model. Base models will also give you way more variation between different seeds on the same prompt.
@makiaeveli I've tried using the same prompt with the distilled version as well as the base version, following the same formulas as the examples (50 step/cfg 5 for base, and 8step/cfg1 for distilled) I definitely prefer the results with the same prompt from the distilled. I guess the images just look more realistic, although they aren't as refined, limbs can be a promblem, but the noise/issues often lend the image to have a bit more reality to them over the base version.
@fiyota share few images if you can please , then is this distill model will perform better than the base with distill turbo lora on top of it ?
@fiyota Perhaps cfg 5 is too high.
(I'm new to this, sorry if I'm saying something stupid) Every image that I generate with this model (Flux 2 Klein 9B), with the same config in the images, but with a different seed, it generates completely disfigured, it is rare that I manage to generate a fully composed image. Is anyone else having this problem? I tested LoRas that improve this in theory, but they didn't help at all.
The case you describe sounds like a prompting issue, I experienced myself. Small changes in prompt can have large impact in Flux Klein, both ways. Sampler and scheduler matters too. SA-Solver + beta57 is a good choice. You may also experiment with higher step values (especially with Base + Turbo LoRa workflow).
In general, Flux Klein is a compact transformer model that prioritizes image quality, speed, and prompt adherence, but its reduced capacity makes it more prone to losing global body structure, especially in full-body scenes and at higher resolutions. For me, a basic workaround is to generate at low resolutions, and then add a second pass upscale, latent upscale or just a simple classic ESRGAN (4x_foolhardy_Remacri is a great choice). Anatomical weaknesses may still occur, but not that often as in higher resolutions.
Older UNet-based models had same issues, but they have been finetuned heavily over time. Compact transformer-based diffusion models are hard to finetune, but we are heading in the right direction. Like SNOFS.
are you per chance using the BASE model without the proper cfg and steps?
Guys, thank you very much for the answers and tips, they helped me a lot! I realized that the biggest mistake I was making was my own mistake. In Load Clip, I was using qwen_3_8b_fp8mixed, when I started using qwen_3_8b, it improved by 90%, it looked great and by far this model is one of the best I've tested.
You know how to lift weights! Great job tuning without blowing everything out. LoRa\LoKr train on top perfectly.
is there a turbo lora for your base 1.4 model??
The Checkpoint has a hard whitewash skin and face that changes my character lora into other person, its quite unstable and unreliable in that matter, i've seen it in multiple samples down below too. That's makes it unusable for my workflow sadly, but have quite decent variations in poses, just the skin tones and complexities were focused too much in the training i think or missing prompts in skin complexities or tones...
I use this Model for a while now. But i have still Problems with cooks. By blowjobs often there have a doubledildo (Looks like a Real penis) in there mouth and booth blowing them or the penis comes out of a Bad Part (like the navel or knee). Everything Else i cant complain, i love this Model.
Could we get an FP8 version of the base version? The base version is much better at prompt adherence, but the BF16 version makes it very slow to run.
FP16 for base please?....lol , thanks in advance.
How to avoid my character lora to look white washed and forced facial structures and hair from this checkpoint?, i'm unable to fix it. any suggestions someone?=
Is there a way to prevent the yellow tint this model does after Img2Img?
I use 2 color correction nodes after Klein: Colormatchv2 - for automatic or Hue and Saturation - for manual. It is usually necessary to reduce the yellow tone.
usually adding the term "neutral white balance" to the prompt can remedy that.
This is the best NSFW model but struggles a lot with feet, they are deformed most of the time, it can only make them when they are just in a neutral position being look at from above.
Is it possible to make them better for next version?
Would love this too, cant believe no one made a feets lora yet. Where my foot boys at?
@dungaipara532 if you add just a single image of a foot from the bottom as a reference it helps a lot
I have a dumb question. If I want to use this checkpoint to train a NSFW character lora should I be training it on the SNOFS Distilled version or the SNOFS base version?
Never use a distilled model for training, always use a base model.
@hs244 thanks!
Excuse yourself, as this does not qualify as "dumb question". Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Why image outputs have such dirty colors and excesive moles and dirty skin?, images comes out very dirty.
this model is best for edition, I ever saw. face swaps, style swaps, NFSW stuff. and its quick. I use it on image_flux2_klein_image_edit_9b_distilled workflow from Comfy UI templates
@lantoniak617 what is "edition" ? Oh was that you trying to type "editing" with one hand ?
Since I don't see settings, what is everyone rec. settings for the FP8 version?
Details
Files
snofsSexNudesAndOther_v14Klein9bDistilled.safetensors
Mirrors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors
flux-2-klein-base-9b.safetensors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors
snofs.safetensors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors
snofsSexNudesAndOtherFunStuff_v14Distilled.safetensors



















