Did a quick test with a Preview3 trained character Lora and stacking the highres lora seems to work fine. It helps A LOT with backgrounds from my check on x1536 base resolution.

Keeps style of character Lora fully intact.

looks like WAIslop ngl

If the same training step target is set,

will training

sequentially 10 epochs of [512] > [1024] > [1536]

be more beneficial for high-resolution details than 10 epochs of [512, 1024, 1536]?

I know the latter has already been implemented in the script, while the former requires manual operation in a certain sense.

Damn these loras are fire!

"The images are sampled to have a more even balance of SFW/NSFW and male/female (because otherwise, selecting on ratings only, you would get almost 100% NSFW female)"
Thank you for addressing this, you guys are truly gods ❤️🎉

Add anima support for WaveSpeed. With my highres fix config, it can reduce highres fix sampling time by up to 70%.

Add it just before highres fix and after base image sampling.
object_to_patch: diffusion_model
residual_diff_threshold: 0.200
start: 0
end: 1
max_consecutive_cache_hits: 2 residual_diff_threshold_end: 0.300 threshold_schedule: linear num_always_run_blocks: 4
enable_diagnostics: false

https://github.com/WalkingMeatAxolotl/Comfy-WaveSpeed

good

It definitely helps at 1024x1536 and above with complex prompts. At the same time it seems to reduce amount of details, which is really counter intuitive. Here is an example of simple prompt that preview3 handles generally well even without this lora at 1024x1536 https://civitai.com/images/127489918

At lower resolutions it is even more noticeable.

where is the realism lora

good improvements for higher res generations, and helps a lot with some subjects that were not fully covered by the preview 3 checkpoint yet, but it does seem to be a bit too sfw. the idea of a balance is not just good but greatly appreciated but you might want to increase the number of imaged used. Also... is gemma really the best at tagging? Personally I found it to be a bit too "safety conscious" for that kind of work. Then again, I think it might just be up to the mproj used and luck. Sometimes you get good tags, sometimes the vision model just goes over detail as if it's not there.

Oh and... depending on the prompt, that "little" detail you bring up is a LOT more impressive that you make it sound in the LORA description.

Base 1.0 update when? Really doesn't seem as great on Base 1.0 maybe I'm crazy

Applying a LoRA to the latest Anima Base V1.0 checkpoint slightly changes the image style, especially in terms of contrast and saturation.

In comparison, the previous Preview 3 checkpoint had excellent compatibility and caused almost no stylistic changes.

If possible, I would appreciate an update based on the latest checkpoint.

I also found the details to be lost and got a much worse prompt adherence BUT I disagree this is 'counter intuitive'. You can load up the model just during upscale and you get all the benefits of the model.

Please can you update this great LORA and maybe your RL one but for the Base version. Thank you.

this need a base version!

great for detailed clothing