Imagine a virus that doesn't get you sick, at least not in the traditional way. Instead it gets you horny. That's the simple concept behind Luststruck. Maybe it's natural, maybe it was bio engineered to combat low birth rates, maybe it's magic. Whatever the cause, here are the effects:
In women it increases production of all bodily fluids, as this is how it spreads. Sweat, saliva, tears, blood, and pussy juice all carry a viral load. Wet it can be infectious through skin contact. Dried it remains viable for hours, but must come into contact with a mucus membrane. The incubation period is a few hours to a few days depending on exposure during which time arousal will ramp up while modesty will deteriorate. This culminates in what has been dubbed the 'lust strike' which is a spontaneous orgasm which permanently alters the woman's brain. On some level infected women feel a compulsion to spread it. After all, it feels so wonderful.
Arousal is off the charts while shame is eroded. Oxytocin production ramps up, making these women especially receptive and rather than just pleasure seeking they are eager to please. Their bodies produce pheromones which are especially attractive to uninfected men and women.
In men testosterone and cum production increases while refractory periods are significantly reduced. Only a man's semen is infectious, however the viral load is so high if administered internally the virus enters the bloodstream and invades the brain in minutes.
Trigger word: luststruck, aroused
Basically I wanted a way to consistently make women look really horny without a dozen tags. Luststruck women will in general have half-closed lustful eyes, a hungry seductive smile, sweat, heavy breathing, and enough pussy juice to fill a bathtub.
Yes, it's silly. Yes, I was drunk. Hopefully you all get some use out of it.
While the training data was diverse it did have a heavy slant towards a single style, and because of that this LoRA imparts style. Maybe at some point I'll do a v.2, but for now I like the style, and it's overridden pretty easily with @artist tags and style LoRA so I'm not too worried.
Description
FAQ
Comments (5)
Any chance of an illu version, or is anima your preferred model for now?
I'd actually trained it a couple of times on Illu a month or two ago, but never loved the results. I'll look back at some of those gens and see if I was just tired of looking at it at the time and it's worth putting out there.
Ooh, yeah, it's a bit rough. Much more locked into the style and a little broken. I've got the buzz to spare so I'm going to run the data set through Civit's trainer instead of trying again on my own and see how that pops out.
Civit's trainer failed massively. I get just blocks and smears of color. In the end I retrained it myself (twice, the first time I accidentally had my Hanta-chan data set selected too and girls would randomly get mouse ears). I still don't think it's as smooth as the Anima version, but it does the job. If you make something cool with it please post it here!
@DarkfireAI Thank you! Will do 😁



















