If you like my models and want to support my work, please subscribe to my Patreon! For only $3.99 a month, you'll get access to all my works and exclusive content. Your support means the world to me and helps me keep creating more high-quality models! ❤️https://www.patreon.com/c/AIBeauty565
Krea2 spread anal
Lora type:Krea2
triger：krea2anal, spread anal,
prompt：krea2anal, spread anal, 1girl, solo, anus, ass, pussy, spread anus, uncensored, nude, realistic, photorealistic, gaping, brown hair, completely nude, couch, open mouth,
genarated checkpoint: krea2TurboOfficialComfy_krea2TurboInt8.safetensors
Moody-Krea-Mix-premium_00002__clean_convrot_int8.safetensors
training checkpoint: Krea 2 Raw
recommend strength: 0.9
sampler name: ddim
scheduler: sgm_uniform
Description
FAQ
Comments (3)
Just wondering about the destroyed/discolored look these LORAs always show in the previews. Is it something about the checkpoints used? Because the anal gape kink is - iirc - mostly about smooth, pink funnels.
I think that’s just how a lot of Krea 2 gens look. The model itself often has that slightly degraded / off-color texture, not specifically these LoRAs.
I was referring to the grey-brown discoloration of the actual skin around the anus. It's quite uncommon in porn. Actresses either don't have it, or use anal bleaching to get rid of it.
Also the anal skin (the pink part) always has this wrinkly destroyed / wrecked type of look. It's just not pleasing to look at, in particular if the style of the image suggests a clean hi-shine production with 18-25yo models on white bedsheets.
So that is why i'm wondering whether this has something to do with the checkpoints used to render the prompts, or if the LORAs are actively trained with B-grade images.