CivArchive
    Qwen Image 2.1 Fix v1.0 - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 143533599
    Preview 143533607
    Preview 143533613
    Preview 143533615
    Preview 143533617
    Preview 143533621
    Preview 143533623
    Preview 143533631
    Preview 143533646
    Preview 143533651
    Preview 143533653
    Preview 143533657
    Preview 143533662

    Turns out Qwen Image 2.1 isn't as broken as it seems. If you use the right settings and train a lora to fix some broken layers, you can get SOTA results from it.

    This version is my first attempt. There are some things it still doesn't do well, but I'm adding to the dataset as I find problems.

    The images in the right were generated with different settings and a sampler from RES4LYF. Get the workflow with the proper settings here.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (18)

    MescalambaSep 22, 2026
    CivitAI

    Thats impressive. Thank you!

    HegrieSep 22, 2026· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    Hmm...
    ERROR lora diffusion_model.transformer_blocks.21.img_mlp.out.weight The size of tensor a (12288) must match the size of tensor b (4096) at non-singleton dimension 1

    _Envy_
    Author
    Sep 22, 2026

    I'll push an update momentarily.

    _Envy_
    Author
    Sep 22, 2026

    Try downloading again and let me know if it works for you.

    HegrieSep 22, 2026

    It works. Thank you!

    MescalambaSep 22, 2026

    It worked for me? Its DoRA.

    What was fix?

    Dunno, whatever I downloaded clearly resulted in much better pics.

    _Envy_
    Author
    Sep 23, 2026

    @Mescalamba ai-toolkit outputs doras in a slightly different layer format, so I patched it and fixed the lora.

    ellricSep 22, 2026· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    what is it fixing?

    _Envy_
    Author
    Sep 22, 2026

    The terrible, messy details.

    SolidCodeSep 23, 2026· 1 reaction

    @_Envy_ Which side is the fixed one?

    _Envy_
    Author
    Sep 23, 2026· 5 reactions

    @SolidCode You can't tell which side has terrible, messy details?

    KurovaiSep 23, 2026· 5 reactions

    I can understand SolidCode's point, in many (almost all) cases the original is better composition wise but in some cases this lora helps to correct broken anatomy

    dead711Sep 23, 2026· 3 reactions

    @Kurovai Exactly. The original image looks better pretty much every time. With the prompts not included it also makes it impossible to tell which is more accurate or how poorly they were prompted to begin with.
    I'd recommend labeling the lora examples and include the prompts to avoid future confusion, but personally I feel it ruins the aesthetics for limited gain.

    ElGordoAISep 24, 2026

    @_Envy_what's exactly wrong with qwen, the only fix i needed was degrid so the qwen vae artifacts get mitigated

    KYoshinoSep 22, 2026· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    nice, sample images indeed look much better

    J1BSep 23, 2026· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    It can make the image cleaner and more armature photo looking, but seems to hurt photorealism a bit with some prompts.

    Unscathed7928Sep 23, 2026· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    More of a tradeoff Lora than a Fix lora. You fix one thing but break another

    _Envy_
    Author
    Sep 23, 2026

    I traded a hard problem for an easy one. I'm working on fixing the training data.

    LORA
    Qwen 2

    Details

    Downloads
    1,417
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    9/22/2026
    Updated
    9/26/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    qwen-image-2.1-fix-1.0.safetensors

    Mirrors

    qwen-image-2.1-fix-1.0-comfy.safetensors

    Qwen Edit 2.1 Optimal Settings.json