CivArchive
    Hillside - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 12672533
    Preview 12671819
    Preview 12671858
    Preview 12671851
    Preview 12671827
    Preview 12671818
    Preview 12671792
    Preview 12671856
    Preview 12671811
    Preview 12671816
    Preview 12671817
    Preview 12671820

    use Hillside for anything not restricted by the license

    Description

    Use hillside for anything not limited to a license.

    I recommend you start creating with:

    Sampling method: Euler a

    Schedule type: Polyexponential/Karras

    Sampling steps: 42 or more

    Upscale:

    Sampling method: Euler a

    Schedule type: Polyexponential

    FAQ

    Comments (13)

    homoludensMay 16, 2024
    CivitAI

    TL;DR; I'm not saying that this CKPT is bad BUT can't get it working yet... please help.
    Can't get this model working for me. The image quality which I just posted suggests me that I'm doing something wrong.

    I've used different samplers and used PolyExpo and Karras as author suggested. But I'm still receiving garbage.

    Current ideas: incompatible LoRas or A1111 WebUI internal issue with CKPT weights corruption... [shrugz jpg]

    RobbedoesMay 16, 2024· 1 reaction

    Tried this model myself and got some nice looking results. (Scheduler: Euler Ancestral, CFG: 5, Steps: 50).
    No use of any LoRA's. The model seems just fine to me.

    frankmikeMay 16, 2024

    i find sometimes, some models don't like a ton of weird negatives, and you have quite a few if those are the ones you used. I'm trying this model now so maybe i'm wrong. But I would try removing or cleaning up the negatives you have.

    frankmikeMay 16, 2024

    unnatural body without any imperfections, non-natural leather without wrinkles and pigmentation defects, main subject have noticeable anatomical issues, picture have no strong emotions and lacks of drama, calm peaceful atmosphere, picture doesn't show any pleasant visuals or intricate details and image is quite boring and have bad composition, main subject is not obvious, image doesn't follow the rule of thirds BREAK ziprealism_neg that's a lot of odd stuff in there. -------------The negatives need like 1 word. I don't think it understands things like no strong emotions. If you want peaceful, say that in the prompt. If you don't want like, cartoons, say that in the negative. Otherwise you just removed a bunch of keywords and its probably getting confused.

    homoludensMay 16, 2024

    @frankmike I can see your point and I can expect an aesthetic effect of not understanding negatives, but I'm not expecting the hard damage like on this image... Let me check the same with another prompt and regular negatives.

    homoludensMay 16, 2024

    Looks like the LoRas is the root cause... Will delete my posted image and post new ones.

    frankmikeMay 16, 2024

    @homoludens  i did one model and all I got were weird robots. All because of the negatives, try these, its what i'm currently using------- Low resolution,low rez,unfocused,undefined,extra arms,long neck,missing arms,low quality,mutation,mutated hands,mutated legs,unsharp, illustration,normal quality,too many legs,worst quality, low quality, normal quality, lowres, low details, oversaturated, undersaturated, overexposed, underexposed,(cartoon, 3d, 3d render, Photoshop, sketch, sketches, video game, draw, paint, painting, render, cgi, computer graphics, anime, manga, 2d art, 3d art, illustration:1.1), (canvas frame, watermark, signature, username, artist name:1.1),black and white,watermark, candles in bottles,text,OUT OF FRAME,BAD CROP,SNAPSHOT, lomo, black and white

    frankmikeMay 16, 2024

    @homoludens  now it doesn't always listen these negatives, but it seems to bump the quality . it might also be the sampler, I don't know how sensitive this one is, i've found that while slower DPM+++ SDE Karras works well on everything. I'm also not using loras. So far while the results aren't all that artful, and it looks like almost all the other models i've used, it is sharp and it is coming out.

    homoludensMay 17, 2024

    @frankmike Most issues disappeared after I removed the Dystopian LoRas

    nickfli121May 17, 2024· 1 reaction

    @homoludens Remember that SD generates two images at each iteration, one from the positive prompt and one from the negative. It can be useful to try negative prompts in the positive to see if they are understood by the model and what effect they have. Elements from the negative image can also bleed into the final image in some cases, because, loosely speaking, the presence of elements in the negative may guide the positive / final result in directions that it wouldn't have gone were they not in the negative image in the first place.

    homoludensMay 17, 2024

    @nickfli121 That's exactly what I tried to test by my more "organic/natural" negatives.

    homoludensMay 17, 2024
    CivitAI

    Issues with initial image were fixed by removing the LoRas.
    I tested the model a bit. PROs: it shows good adherence to my positive prompt and good contrast. CONs: it gives high rate of inconsistent structures, deformations and sometimes it gives oversimplified structures.

    THIS APPLIES to my particular prompts. You may get other experience.

    I can suggest making MBW (blockwise merging) of this model with something creative and/or more stable with low weights. This CKPT could use some polishing by my feelings.

    Cannot give a proper review so far...

    homoludensMay 17, 2024

    https://civitai.com/models/460013?modelVersionId=511957
    I've created the merge-fix of CinEro XL v1.5 with HillSide v1.0.

    Let me know if you don't want this merge to exist.

    Checkpoint
    SDXL 1.0

    Details

    Downloads
    315
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    5/16/2024
    Updated
    5/13/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    hillside_v10.safetensors

    Mirrors

    HuggingFace (1 mirrors)
    CivitAI (1 mirrors)

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.