💫 Online Generation available at Shakker.ai!
📍Recommended Parameters:
· Samplers:
DPM++ SDE
DPM++ 2M SDE Karras
DPM++ 2M SDE Exponential
DPM++ 3M SDE
I DO NOT recommend the use of the following samplers:
DPM++ 2M Karras
DPM2 Karras
Restart
DPM Fast
Euler
⚠️ Useful Trigger words:
film grain
raw
real life photo
amateur
traditional media
low quality
reddit
r/amateur
⚡️BUZZ FOR BEST IMAGES⚡️
Description
Cleaner look and better prompt adherence
FAQ
Comments (8)
Very nice results, thanks Zyloo. Do you think it is a good model to train character on?
also i wanted to ask, did you play horde or alliance ?
I love this model but if there will be a 3.0 I'd put "less heavy on the shadows" on the wish list. Pretty much all other models I have to add "multiple soft natural shadows" to the prompt to make them come out like I want, but here I have to fight them off.
Results from community and creator look stunning but I cannot make it work in ComfyUI. Loaded the workflow from several different images found on this page and made sure I have the correct vae and model. When image gets decoded - it's all in artifacts and the actual render is barely seen. It's almost like white noise, but with yellow tint :D
Ah, found the problem. When workflow is opened in ComfyUI - Clip Set Last Layer is set to -1 which might be confused with clip skip 1. It should be set to -2 instead and then everything works. However only with model embedded vae, and not the raw external one
Everything works the same for me in ComfyUI with built-in or external VAE - the picture is absolutely the same. You can change layers. I tried -1, -2, -3, -4, -5. The picture changes a lot, and I can't choose the best option, but the option without skipping a clip may be even better than the others. So I just removed the clip skipping node. At the same time, for me -2 always corresponds to no clip skipping. That is, if everything works for you at -2, then also try not skipping clips.
I couldn't reproduce exact copies of the sample images, although I repeated all the settings exactly. And my results are worse in quality, especially the face. I used a resolution of 832x1216, and the resolution of the samples is higher. Maybe I should generate the image at a higher resolution?