Illustrious × Pony Mi×
v3 is the best version of the merge by far! Improvements:
There is now a default style, which looks good even if you don't use pony score tags, aesthetic prompts, LoRAs or artist tags! The first preview image uses none of these. Just a basic positive prompt and negative prompt.
Because of the above LoRA compatibility is much better.
Even less noise and latent garbling than v2.
Better prompt-adherence, quality and anatomy.
The model now has a NAI3-like clarity and details.
Backgrounds still need further improvement.
Previous updates:
v2 is a significant improvement over the original model, with less latent noise and better anatomy, including hands and fingers.
This is a merge of my fine-tune of illustrious, with my fine-tune of a Pony-base model.
Works with pony scoretags, rating tags and Illustrious artist tags. Pony score tags, which are optional and activate Pony-mode, should be at the head of your prompt, followed by the artist.
Effect of
score_9,score_8_up,score_7_upat different strengths:

If you do not specify the artist, the default style looks like crap because I did not use caption dropout in the final adjustment fine-tune the results look great!
Some kind words are appreciated, it was a massive pain to merge the two models. This output isn't perfect but does complex scenes really well and to me, has a certain charm, just like the base Illustrious model.
General method:
First step was to use train difference and comparative interpolation to merge the models. These two models are then merged normally. The result is noisy and greyish but actually contains the properties and knowledge of both models. This is where I fine tuned the model on a dataset of 400,000 images for one epoch to stabilise it. I then merged a set of special LoRAs which bring out features muted by the merge. This is followed by fine tuning another model on the same data for 2 epochs - this model when converted into a LoRA and applied at negative strength significantly improves anatomy/fingers/noise. This was then merged to make the v2 model linked.
The result is that pony score tags and rating tags work, and so do the illustrious artist tags. The detail of the original Illustrious model is also boosted. Using pony prompts recalled the same kinds of images I used with the Pony fine-tune I merged in, confirming the concepts transferred through.
Tools:
https://github.com/silveroxides/sd-webui-untitledmerger
https://github.com/hako-mikan/sd-webui-supermerger/issues/408
https://github.com/Linaqruf/kohya-trainer/blob/main/Kohya%20Trainer%20XL%20Runpod.ipynb
Description
FAQ
Comments (8)
Also curious about CivitAI Gen for this. I'd love to check it out, and hopefully that'd force them to fix the Lora model compatibility-locking on here.
I've noticed people have a different way of writing artist names in Illustrious prompts over just writing "art by artist" or "medium by artist" can someone please explain to me why this is?
this is crazy. what kind of stuff are you cooking! xD. BTW, any plan to try merge Animagine XL3.1 and IllustriousXL? Im pretty sure with combination of quality that AnimagineXL3.1 provides, and versatility that IllustriousXL provide can give an amazing result too.
If you want good backgrounds, you should mix Illustrious with the SnowPony SnowAlt model. Hands down it produces some of the best backgrounds and images I've ever seen, and all my LoRA have worked amazingly with it.
can this be mixed with other pony and illustrious models and if so how would you recommend it be done? do I need to do a half and half mix?
It can mimic certain artstyle on the face pretty well but the body tend to fall into the same default body shape and texture and I have no idea to get rid of it besides using few artstyles that managed to hide it pretty well, but it doesn't work to most styles
Hey, this checkpoint works with the Illustrious' Loras but doesn’t seem to work with the Pony Loras. Is there a fix for this, or is it just not compatible?
Which sampler are you using on the demo?