<h1 id="commercial-use-of-this-model-is-not-allowed-7tl12adba">❌💲 Commercial use of this model is not allowed</h1><h2 id="the-description-is-mainly-for-the-pony-version.-sh03tnm7b">🐴The description is mainly for the Pony version.</h2>also not listing the SD 1.5 version in the title because it makes me want to puke I have no idea why it's THIS badI've been busy trying to improve the dataset for a previous LoRA, but I began feeling burnt out and even got kind of moody in the past few days, so I switched to making a dataset for <s>yet</s> another Worms LoRA, this time based on some official art. There were several questionable choices with what pictures to use for the dataset (particularly pictures with a lot of worms or lowres images).<h3 id="dataset-98oyli0rr">🖼DATASET</h3>58 images which are all tagged manually. All original images are <s>hopefully</s> property of Team17.Most images are related to Worms 3D, Worms 4: Mayhem, some G3 games (I never played those but they came with some fun wallpapers) and Worms 3 (also never played that one but I found the cards artwork interesting).All the pictures have lineart and are cel-shaded. No sketches or lineless images.Some pictures include clothes (mostly headwear, no bodysuits), and hair. 2 images depict dark-skinned worms.Some pictures show conjoined eyes and floating tongues.There aren't any "feminine" hairstyles, attempt them at your own risk.I added captions "worms3dca", "worms4mayhemca" and "worms3ca" to some images:<ul><li>worms3dca is assigned to what I'm sure is concept art for Worms 3D (except the sheet with many "chibi" worms), it should give most solid results</li><li>worms4mayhemca is assigned to what I'm sure is concept art for Worms: 4 Mayhem; lineart is a bit more traditional/rough looking, warmer shades (it was originally strongly tinted and I tried to fix that), may contain conjoined eyes</li><li>worms3ca is assigned to artwork for Worms 3: it all has thick lineart which is usually coloured, there are almost no shiny eyes and the worms tend to have easily noticeable folds on the back of their body (these images are also in lower resolution, but this isn't Fluх that copies quality of lowres images so literally, it shouldn't be much of a problem)</li></ul>Recently I learned that "disembodied hands" isn't the right term for Worms. For this LoRA I used "floating hands" instead... which didn't help avoid arms still.I used "half-closed eyes" AND "lidded eyes" as tags so I hope they both work.<h3 id="issues-88cda5abw">⚠ISSUES</h3>Typical issues that my Worms LoRAs have: pupils, eyebrows, mouths, THE GODDAMN ARMS, in some cases human features.The worm may look like he has 2 tails, "from side" might help.The worm may have a weird vertically extended body, try "straight body, tail down" in negative.The worm may appear to be floating in air unprompted, try "jumping, in air" in negative.Score tokens tend to change the style (observed with regular Pony, I haven't tested other base models yet).It seems biased towards WWI/WWII helmets.

Worms Team17 2D mix [PDXL-IlluXL]

THIS VERSION HAS CHANGES TO TAGS, find bold text to get to the point"What, you decided to train for Illustrious so soon?" Well, I thought this dataset might work with Illustrious WAY better than the Mayhem one: it's 2D, it has lineart, it has cel shading - similar enough to how they usually draw anime.I did some more digging into Danbooru tags and I found myself wondering: do tags related to absence of limbs actually do anything on Illustrious if the LoRA character naturally doesn't have them? They don't use anything of the sort for Pokemon with a body type similar to Worms. "armless" and "limbless" don't exist; "no arms", "no legs" and "legless" are deprecated and imply something else entirely. "floating hand" is aliased to "disembodied hand", which is also not what I want, but on E621 "floating hands" means the same thing as "rayman limbs" from Danbooru (if you ignore feet) which screws with my mind.Anyway where I'm geting with this: I REMOVED tags "limbless", "armless" and "legless". Tag "floating hands" is replaced with "rayman limbs", analogous change done for the singular tag. There was tag "no hands", I'm not even sure it's needed, I decided to simply remove it.From local tests this LoRA doesn't seem to be a downgrade compared to the Pony version. I guess it means the tokens "limbless", "armless" and "legless" ARE USELESS... at least with Illustrious. If results turn out to be humanoid, I think adding "animal focus" might help.Dataset images are the same as for the Pony version, changes were only made to tags. Trained on Illustrious-XL (v0.1) via Civitai.

Files with SHA256: 11ed543773a554f4b47262ad4d70af72693409c212de624a9e5bdbcbf4117d38