This Lora feature high-fidelity digital rendering with a semi-realistic aesthetic, characterized by dramatic cinematic lighting with intricate shadow patterns, luminous emissive eyes as central focal points, and a shallow depth of field that emphasizes sharp facial details and varied material textures. This lora works better for close-ups/portraitsBased on MJ Niji v7NIJI SWEET SPOT BRANCHES:<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/2853315/zaey-ultra-quality-style?modelVersionId=3222428">Zaey Ultra Quality Style - Krea2_v1.0 | Krea 2 LoRA | Civitai</a><a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/2853342/zaey-painterly-drawing-style?modelVersionId=3222396">Zaey Painterly Drawing Style - Anima_v1.0 | Anima LoRA | Civitai</a><h3 id="please-read-the-description">- PLEASE READ THE DESCRIPTION -</h3>You can look into the showcase images for the settings!MOSS V1 A&amp;B:Strenght 0.5 - 1.0 MOSS is a really cool and interesting checkpoint that might seem a bit difficult to use at times. For the showcase images, I used both the Base and SFT versions of the main model. They produce very different results, so I highly recommend experimenting with both.ANIMA v5:Strenght: 0.4 - 1.0 (1.0 Might be too strong sometimes, recommended for general use is around 0.6-0.8)Trained using an updated version of the Krea2 v2_A dataset. Updating Niji Sweet Spot Anima beyond version 4 was quite challenging, mainly because it already had such good quality. After training version 2A of Krea2, I was curious to try it on Anima as well, and I was amazed by the results—the quality is outstanding, the anatomy looks fantastic, facial features are exceptional, and the overall composition is impressive. I hope you enjoy it as much as I do! (Some of the images in the showcase were intentionally left without upscaling or high‑res fix, to highlight that the model delivers impressive quality even with simple, basic generation.)Krea2 v2 A &amp; B:Trained using an updated version of the dataset from Anima v2_A and B. The main idea of both versions is to achieve better lighting and brigther colors. The style is a bit weaker so I recommend using more strenght (0.8 - 1.5 but you can mostly keep it on 1.0) and try to avoid adding a style on your prompt (realism, 3d, anime screenshot...)Krea2 v1:Krea2 is looking good, and I finally decided to make a Niji Sweet Spot version of it! As you can see in the showcase, the style keeps a look similar to Anima v4, but it handles fine details much better thanks to Krea2’s quality. I hope you all enjoy experimenting with it!I HIGHLY RECOMMEND USING KREA2 FILTERBYPASS LORA ALONG WITH ITStrenght: 0.6-1.2Anima v4:A completely new and larger dataset was created to improve anatomical accuracy and to address the overly sharp lines that versions v2_A and v3 developed. Introducing a new triggerword, since I believe Anima could be confused with certain artists of similar names to the previous triggerword. Improved clothing textures, adding a subtle 3D effect to it.Anima v3:Version 3 is a bit stronger than Version 2, but it is still very flexible. I strongly recommend using: "lowres, (bad quality, worst quality:1.2), long neck, bad anatomy, watermark, jpeg artifacts, ugly, poorly drawn" as a negative prompt, since in many tests it proved to significantly improve quality. Anatomy has also been improved, as well as some textures.Anima v2 A and B:Now with v2, you can achieve more stable results than with v1. I also managed to create two distinct major styles for you to choose from: Style A, an Anima successor of Ultra-Style version, and Style B, with a more stylized anime look. Both still maintains flexibility with different art/artist styles. Have fun discovering you favorite NIJI SWEET SPOT look!Anima v1:You have the same possibilities as the illustrious versions, but now with greater general stability thanks to how good Anima is! Just like the illustrious versions, this LoRA offers amazing flexibility with styles. I hope you enjoy exploring and finding what suits you best.<span style="background-color:rgb(24, 24, 24);color:rgb(255, 255, 255);font-family:v-sans, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, sans-serif, &quot;Apple Color Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Symbol&quot;;font-size:16px">A new style option called Ultra Style<span style="background-color:rgb(24, 24, 24);color:rgb(255, 255, 255);font-family:v-sans, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, sans-serif, &quot;Apple Color Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Symbol&quot;;font-size:16px"> has also been added. In my opinion, it is the best at generating beautiful and striking compositions! Now both the strong and soft versions are more refined (as you can see comparing both showcased images) and significantly more stable in terms of general anatomy (fewer issues with fingers).Strenght: 0.6-1.0You can achieve some variation styles based on the artists and quality tags you add to your promptMy favorite ones (Illustrious):<ul><li>NJsw33t, blurry background, depth of field, rim light, chiaoscuro, (anime coloring, flat color, sketch), (umikochannart:0.3), (huangdanlan:1.2), (kagoya1219:0.5), (genyaku:0.4), (artist:pigeon666:0.67),(dino_(dinoartforame):0.5),(quasarcake:0.4), (by jima:1.2), by putimaxi,</li><li>NJsw33t, blurry, blurry background, depth of field, close-up, best quality, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, newest, very aesthetic, absurdres, 8k, good anatomy, good shading, ultra detailed, refined details, high resolution, HD, masterwork, (semi-realistic) Sharp focus, ((donghua style)), ((realistic shading)) (mazjojo:0.67), (pigeon666:0.83), (zawar379:0.73), fujii eishun,</li><li>sw33t, blurry, background, depth of field, best quality, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, newest, very aesthetic, absurdres, 8k, good anatomy, good shading, ultra detailed, refined details, high resolution, HD, masterwork,(photorealistic:1.2), Sharp focus, dynamic details, dynamic angle, dynamic action, dynamic pose, (kotteri:1.3), gravitydusty, (umikochannart:0.3), (huangdanlan:1.2), (watanabe tomari:1.2), (kagoya1219:0.5), (genyaku:0.4).</li></ul>

Niji Sweet Spot

Lighting and texture works diffently on each MOSS versions (A and B). There is not a better one, it will depend on your preference so I recommend everyone to test both

Files with SHA256: 1ae5f5ff1f08c34ee03a17e1d1dc29e0834167523e86cf1c5913dabbffc9b9c1