Important information about each version is in, wait for it... the version notes! (Suggest reading those so you know how bad each one is. Thank you.)I strongly recommend...ADetailer model: face_yolov8n.ptUsing a variation seed (You'll get a lot of near misses, can't imagine life without a variation seed)And suggest...VAE: vae-ft-mse-840000-ema-pruned.ckpt (Since it's the only VAE I've ever used...)DPM++ 3M SDE &amp; Automatic at 30-40 steps, 768 x 512 upscaled to whatever size at between 0.20 &amp; 0.50 denoising strength, CFG 3.5-5 at these settings...(There are probably better settings, but I don't experiment as much as I should)

No Skinny Chicks

A few notes for Aeaea Cove I…<ul><li>Renders fatness well, I find it produces more natural curves and rolls than some of my other checkpoints, for a heavier and less inflated appearance.</li><li>Generally good at anatomy in my experience, for SD 1.5.</li><li>Some bias towards an exaggerated pear shaped figure, but is capable of producing more natural shapes with prompting.</li><li>Responds strongly to face references.</li><li>The most stylised of my current checkpoints, depending on the prompt and settings the images tend to appear more like digital paintings than photographs.</li><li>Very error prone. Don’t expect great images with every click, or even every other click. Recommend using a variation seed so that, if you get a good composition, you can randomise it and keep clicking until you get a good variation of the image.</li><li>Faces can appear unnatural sometimes.</li></ul>I give it… 3/5

Files with SHA256: 24fefaa03c7b268ce15bf48973fb6aceb2e27657f175936ccab9c9e08058fb51