This is my rendition or concept of a Jenna Ortega lora model. In my opinion, which could be more wrong than pigs with a horse head, this lora exceeds others in terms of likeness accuracy of Jenna Ortega.<h1 id="heading-2430">ABOUT</h1>V1: The first attempt at creating a Jenna Ortega model. The models I had been using were good but unsatisfactory. There was just an element missing in all of my sample renders. V1 was my favorite to use on epicPhotogasm v3.1V2: Version two was created at the same time V1 was as a backup since I was very new to lora training. V2 is just V1 with more training steps. V2 seems to be better with epicPhotogasm Z than epicPhotogasm v3.1.V3: V1 &amp; V2 was just not enough for me. Close but not close enough. So V3 was trained. But again, I wasn't satisfied. Far more accurate than V1 and V2 but again this time I felt that I had trained it on subpar images, which created renders with harsher features than I liked.V4: V3 with better images for training for train the model to focus more on Jenna's softer features. V4 seems to be better than V3 but then again, my eyes are pretty broken. You tell me the difference between the models.REBIRTH: Finally, I've landed on a version that I find satisfactory. All of these generations were to find a version that is extremely accurate. Rebirth is that model. I'd rank it at 95% accuracy in likeness whereas previous versions are around 70-80% in accuracy. Useful but missing that UMPH, that says, THAT'S IT! THAT'S HER! Future image renders will be on the Rebirth version of the model. <h2 id="heading-2431">BEST USE</h2>V4: Just use the jenna_ortega_v4 to start the prompt. I usually use a CFG scale of 6 but have been using 7 or 8 as well.V3: Use jenna_ortega_v3 to start your prompt. I don't recommend using Jenna Ortega's name, it will fudge the results in my opinion. Same applies to v4.V2 and V1: You can use Jenna Ortega as part of the prompt. It seems to help, but the results that I got came from using epicPhotogasm.REBIRTH: Just use epicPhotogasm. You can see my settings in the posted images. I will say I start the lora strength at 0.8 instead of 0.7, but 0.7 should be fine. 0.8 is just for my personal assurance.

Jenna Ortega by Brassen250

Again, accuracy and consistency tends to be my main goal. My favorite out of all the models is V4 so far. It's extremely accurate with consistent renders.This model rebuild and retraining seems to generate softer features for Jenna Ortega, which falls in accordance to what I like to see and my perception of Jenna. I think the only trade-off with this Lora is body accuracy. It's trained on more facial recognition rather than full-body images, an oversight I didn't notice until training began. But honestly, good prompting and tweaking should be able to resolve the matter. Then again, might be accurate just my poor eyesight at work with the misconception of the perception.I will say, don't really use jenna ortega's name in the prompt. It fudges the sample renders in my opinion. But you can do what you will with that information.

Files with SHA256: 2781fc452ecb59bcc1315be5f9ff5a67ea787b45102c057742f28bb738ecf4e1