A completely new approach!The original Snakebite was an Illustrious model injected with bigASP's compositional blocks. Snakebite 2.0, however, is primarily bigASP - but enhanced with a number of techniques to dramatically improve its textures and aesthetic capabilities.❤️ If you like Snakebite, you can help offset the cost of training:<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://ko-fi.com/liftweights">Buy liftweights a Coffee</a><hr /><h2 id="important:">⚠️ IMPORTANT:</h2>This model uses Flow Matching, so you must connect it to the ModelSamplingSD3 node in ComfyUI to get correct results. If you're using a different UI that does not support the Flow Matching objective, you can try <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/2045223/snakebite">Snakebite v1.4</a> instead - that one behaves like a regular Illustrious model.<hr /><h2 id="why-change-the-formula">Why change the formula?</h2>While I'm happy with the original Snakebite, there are some "gaps" between the two architectures I haven't been able to close with merging. Over the course of 1.0 through 1.4, I did what I could to minimize weird background objects and extra limbs, but it occurred to me that the perfect solution is already right here, in the form of vanilla bigASP 2.5.I don't know if many people realize how good bigASP is... the prompt adherence is almost Flux-level with none of the censorship, plastic skin, steep hardware requirements, or bad licensing. It's pretty remarkable.I set out to solve two of its main problems:1. bigASP's textures are straight-up scuffed. I don't know if there was an issue with its aesthetic captioning or if it's simply "seen too much" (it was trained on 13 million images!), but no amount of <code>(((high quality, masterpiece, so good)))</code> is going to produce an image that looks even half as good as that of your average SDXL model.2. You need to prompt it for everything. This is not necessarily a bad thing. Problem is, bigASP has some very weird ideas about the stuff you fail to mention. For example, if you ask for <code>1girl, standing</code> it might give you a picture of <code>1girl, standing, morbidly obese, upside down</code>.Both of these problems have been addressed, at least to an extent. It wasn't easy! bigASP's input blocks are really delicate - if you try massaging them with aesthetic LoRAs, the model tends to fall apart completely. Compatibility with SDXL LoRAs is poor, because they were not trained with the Flow Matching technique and bigASP's CLIP is very different.Still, I found some blocks that responded well to my cosmetic upgrades. So I have been slowly and carefully introducing these blocks to things like Direct Preference Optimization with the goal of helping bigASP know what to do when you don't provide a 500-word prompt (i.e. make every picture look decent and not insane)<hr /><h2 id="advantages-over-v1">👍 Advantages over v1</h2>1. Prompt adherence is UH-MAZING for an SDXL model - check demo gallery2. Understands more complex concepts and interactions3. Mangled limbs are almost nonexistent thanks to Flow Matching4. Very flexible with styles; more photorealistic than v1 while also more capable of generating illustrations5. It can spell words pretty well, provided you don't mind re-rolling a few times<h2 id="disadvantages">👎 Disadvantages</h2>1. Aesthetically, it's not as consistent as IL - but it's getting close in newer versions (v2.3)2. The lack of IL means booru tag knowledge is worse, but you might be surprised at how much bigASP knows... it can generate tons of mainstream characters and concepts just fine on its own<hr /><h2 id="recommended-settings">🛠️ Recommended Settings</h2>Turbo:<ul><li>6-9 steps</li><li>LCM sampler</li><li>Beta, normal, or simple scheduler</li><li>CFG 1</li><li>Model shift of 3 (this is the value that bigASP was trained on) or 6 (allegedly even better according to bigASP's author)</li><li>Sample workflow: <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://pastebin.com/Z35kNns6">https://pastebin.com/Z35kNns6</a></li></ul>Full:<ul><li>25-40 steps</li><li>Euler ancestral sampler for speed, dpmpp_2s_ancestral for quality</li><li>Simple scheduler</li><li>CFG 4-6</li><li>Model shift of 3</li><li>Negative prompt strongly recommended (e.g. <code>worst quality</code>)</li><li>Sample workflow: <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://pastebin.com/ynrJ1Nt2">https://pastebin.com/ynrJ1Nt2</a></li></ul>Note: increasing the model shift may improve prompt adherence at the cost of quality. This is particularly useful with character LoRAs. Try a value between 6-8.<hr /><h2 id="prompting-guide">📖 Prompting Guide</h2>The #1 thing is, be careful with your fluff. If you ask for <code>warm lighting</code>, you better believe you're gonna get warm lighting. Like, a lot of it. Even adding a simple <code>high quality</code> to your prompt might change your image completely. So be deliberate. Start with zero fluff.The effect is not always intuitive. For example--as the author of bigASP has pointed out--the term <code>masterpiece quality</code> "causes the model to tend toward producing illustrations/drawings instead of photo."<s>If it's photos you want, I've yet to find phrases that work better than </s><code>onlyfans, abbywinters photo</code><s>. Hey now, I'm being serious! These terms work great for innocent stuff, too.</s> (EDIT: As of v2.2, these helper phrases are optional. Using <code>photograph of a...</code> is usually enough in newer versions of Snakebite.)Also, bigASP's training data was captioned with JoyCaption (<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://huggingface.co/spaces/fancyfeast/joy-caption-beta-one">online demo here</a>, made by same author as bigASP) so you should try speaking to the model in a similar cadence and tone as JoyCaption does. Booru tags work okay too, but they tend to push images in more of a CGI direction.Most of the time, if Snakebite is not giving you the image you want, it's a matter of finding another phrasing or adding (((emphasis))).<hr /><h2 id="training-loras">🏋️‍♂️ Training LoRAs</h2><h3 id="option-a">Option A</h3> There is an official LoRA training script for bigASP 2.5 available here:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://github.com/fpgaminer/bigasp-training/blob/main/v25lora-training-scripts/train-lora.py">https://github.com/fpgaminer/bigasp-training/blob/main/v25lora-training-scripts/train-lora.py</a></li></ul>It's easy to install. I'm running it through my kohya-ss venv, as it only required a couple extra (non-conflicting) dependencies. However, it has a limited feature set and has not been thoroughly battle tested.The <code>train-lora.py</code> script does not target as many modules as kohya's sd-scripts. This results in much smaller LoRA filesizes, but may prove insufficient for e.g. capturing a character's likeness, even at high rank and alpha. To fix this, search for "target_modules" in the script and update accordingly:<pre><code>target_modules=["to_k", "to_q", "to_v", "to_out.0", "k_proj", "v_proj", "q_proj", "out_proj", "proj_in", "proj_out", "conv_in", "conv_out", "ff.net.0.proj", "ff.net.2"]</code></pre>That should produce a file equal in size to that of kohya (at fp16 precision.)Default settings are good. You can increase the <code>lora_rank</code> and <code>lora_alpha</code> if you want, but the default value of 32 is usually fine. It buckets images. Be aware that it only saves a checkpoint at the end of training.Don't train on turbo versions of Snakebite. Either use the full version (once I've uploaded it), or train on bigASP 2.5 vanilla.<h3 id="option-b"> Option B</h3>There is an unofficial fork of sd-scripts that supports Flow Matching, created by @deGENERATIVE_SQUAD : <ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://github.com/rozmary1/sd-scripts">https://github.com/rozmary1/sd-scripts</a></li></ul>This option takes more effort to set up, but it opens up a lot more possibilities for customization. You may need to adjust the code for compatibility with your environment. In my case, I had to remove the <code>--loss_type="fft"</code> parameter and swap out references to <code>transforms.v2 in library/train_util.py</code> with the original code from the sd3 branch.Pass the following arguments to <code>sdxl_train_network.py</code>:--flow_matching ^--flow_matching_objective="vector_field" ^--flow_matching_shift=3.0 ^ <hr />Thank you. As always, I look forward to your feedback. Please share the model and upload some images to help it gain traction. It would be amazing if we could make Snakebite eligible for Civitai's onsite generator someday!

Snakebite 2

2.2 was finetuned on around 700 high-quality photographs to bring the model's baseline style much closer to that of real life. It also has better anatomy and more stable backgrounds.Training details:<ul><li>Used Flow Matching objective for maximum quality.</li><li>Photos were selected for unique backdrops, little to no grain/artifacts, strong composition, and subject diversity.</li><li>Plenty of NSFW material.</li><li>All watermarks removed.</li><li>Other styles--such as "lofi" or "cinematic"--were excluded from the training set, in order to establish the baseline style.</li><li>Trained for 20k steps, then pruned a few overcooked blocks.</li><li>Captions generated with JoyCaption as it's what bigASP knows best.</li></ul>Takeaways:<ul><li>Terms like <code>onlyfans</code> or <code>photorealistic</code> are optional in 2.2. Using <code>photo of a...</code> is usually enough.</li><li>I'm using a quantized version of JoyCaption Beta One that runs on my local hardware, and it's not perfect. It often goes into detail about watermarks that don't exist. I was worried this would harm the model's ability to spell words, but that didn't seem to happen. If anything, Snakebite 2.2 might be a little better at text than ever before. No idea why.</li><li>Despite the carefully cultivated dataset, some image artifacts are present in 2.2. Based on my experience, increasing the dataset to 1-2k images could alleviate this. Improving the captions would also help.</li><li>2.2 likes adding some soft focus/depth of field by default. It's a bit difficult to steer away from. Adding more "sharp focus" photography to the training set would help.</li><li>For me, Snakebite 2.2 represents peak photorealism in SDXL, especially when you factor in the prompt adherence. But if you like making other types of images, you may find that 2.1 is more appropriate for the task.</li></ul>Have fun!

Files with SHA256: 2f1b35b732fee21781336d5911e5dce7a44e005b47fbbbe730ac3dbc6837bd9a