<h2 id="fatal_pout-lip-game-upgraded">Fatal_Pout — Lip Game, Upgraded</h2>First release of a LoRA I’ve made, and I gotta say — it’s been interesting. I started out just wanting a way to add pleasantly full lips that mimic the kind you occasionally see and think “damn... are those real?” Hence the name: Fatal_Pout.<h3 id="v1:">V1:</h3>Very nice and subtle, yet obvious. Pretty damn close to what I was going for — those perfect lips that make you do a double take and question if they’re natural or designer. Really shines for me at 1.0 to 1.3 or so, but can be cranked up to 2+ if you want.I liked the result, but wanted a bit more definition… a little more pow. So I scrubbed the training data, added a fresh batch of ultra-quality samples (bringing the total set to 190), and trained V2.<h3 id="v2:">V2:</h3>One hell of an interesting beast.<ul><li>At low strength (1.0-ish): Subtle — more like a top-tier lip detailer than a full-on injector (pun intended).</li><li>At 2.0: You’ll start seeing IG-influencer-tier lips — full, plump, and polished, but still classy enough to pass.</li><li>2.5+: You’re in Botoxed Trophy MILF territory — not a bad thing, just... be prepared.</li><li>Above 2.5: Anything goes. Some results might be gorgeous, some might look like they fell face-first into the uncanny valley. YMMV.</li></ul>V3:After testing the first two versions of fatal_pout, I realized they were too hit-or-miss—fantastic on some checkpoints, almost invisible on others. I went back to the dataset, cut anything that didn’t truly capture the look I wanted, and added about 100 new, unmistakably “pouty” samples. The alpha was bumped from 16 to 32—less over-filtering of detail, more responsiveness.Multiplier Guide:<ul><li>1.0 – Gentle enhancement: subtle cupid’s bow, light fullness.</li><li>1.5 – Noticeable plumpness, soft and supple.</li><li>2.0 – The “sweet spot” for most: defined pout, undeniable volume.</li><li>2.5 – Social media influencer vibes start kicking in.</li><li>2.75 – Botox territory: slight lower-face swelling, but IG-perfect lips.</li><li>3.0 – Use with caution—you may summon Princess Matilda, Chav royalty, who insists a micro skirt from H&amp;M is formalwear.</li></ul>I’ve tested V3 with Ultra Realistic, Semi Real, cyber-realistic, and even cartoon fine-tunes, and it’s been far more consistent across the board. While there will always be some models that don’t vibe with it, most should work fine.Tip: Use ADetailer for best results—face_<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="http://yolov9c.pt">yolov9c.pt</a> is my go-to, but face_<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="http://yolov8n.pt">yolov8n.pt</a> works well too.

Fatal Pout

After testing the first two versions of fatal_pout, I realized they were too hit-or-miss—fantastic on some checkpoints, almost invisible on others. I went back to the dataset, cut anything that didn’t truly capture the look I wanted, and added about 100 new, unmistakably “pouty” samples. The alpha was bumped from 16 to 32—less over-filtering of detail, more responsiveness.Multiplier Guide:<ul><li>1.0 – Gentle enhancement: subtle cupid’s bow, light fullness.</li><li>1.5 – Noticeable plumpness, soft and supple.</li><li>2.0 – The “sweet spot” for most: defined pout, undeniable volume.</li><li>2.5 – Social media influencer vibes start kicking in.</li><li>2.75 – Botox territory: slight lower-face swelling, but IG-perfect lips.</li><li>3.0 – Use with caution—you may summon Princess Matilda, Chav royalty, who insists a micro skirt from H&amp;M is formalwear.</li></ul>I’ve tested V3 with Ultra Realistic, Semi Real, cyber-realistic, and even cartoon fine-tunes, and it’s been far more consistent across the board. While there will always be some models that don’t vibe with it, most should work fine.Tip: Use ADetailer for best results—face_<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="http://yolov9c.pt">yolov9c.pt</a> is my go-to, but face_<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="http://yolov8n.pt">yolov8n.pt</a> works well too.

Files with SHA256: 5477a78ce814575bae871f4e709561af9c588e5590a7a3d8a44314c2740d3774