A persistent issue with generating images of mermaids in sexual situations is the fact that it's hard to consistently get it to retain the full mermaid form while still keeping true to the prompt. Oftentimes, it will give the mermaid legs even when you explicitly tag out any keywords relating to legs, and that can be a headache to work around.This is the key reason why I trained this lora to rectify the issue, to simplify things and ensure that it's easier to keep the tail intact while still keeping the sexual content. I may keep developing this lora further to iron out some of the less functional aspects, while diversifying the dataset. The goal is to include as many potential positions as possible so you'll have a good toolbox to use for various sex positions.With the anima version out of the way, I decided to experiment with more concepts. The one I ended up adding was intertwined tails, which should aid in yuri, futa and general merfolk hetero content, as well as theoretically allow for lamia on mermaid stuff, even if that part is a bit wonky currently, which is ironic considering the vast majority of images teaching the intertwined tails concept was lamia on mermaid content. Either way, you can now use this model to make lamia yuri, so hooray. The concepts I didn't get to include in the Anima version that I really wanted there were mermaid tail/finjobs (primarily the latter since there's barely anything out there to use for it, and it's extremely hard to prompt), as well as cunnilingus (considering that the vast majority of mermaid cunnilingus art is of the mermaid giving the cunnilingus rather than recieving it). I might be able to rectify it in a future release, but for now I'm satisfied.Illustrious Tags: mermaid sex, legs together, missionary position, cowgirl position, girl on top, tail raised, tail hugAnima tags (unstables/experimentals in paranthesis): mermaid sex, legs together, missionary position, mating press, cowgirl position, girl on top, tail raised, tail hug, tail grab, wheelbarrow position, intertwined tails, cunnilingus, licking pussy (finjob, fin on penis, prehensile tail)I highly recommend you tag in positional tags into positives, as well as putting stuff like conjoined in negatives to prevent some issues that may arise with some configs.Illustrious version is optimal at 0.8, whereas you may wanna use Anima version at 0.7 to 1 depending on what you want to achieve, but I generally advice against 1 for tail hugs and intertwined tails.

Mermaid sex helper

Second version release for anima, with the goal to improve stability as well as add a couple new concepts into the mix. The new concepts I tried to add were cunnilingus (as in, the mermaid recieving it rather than giving it), as well as finjobs. The latter concept barely trained at all due to limited data, but the cunnilingus seems to work without major issues depending on lora weight and target image proportions.As for existing concepts from earlier versions, most of them work fine without too much issue. Specifics:Cowgirl and missionary: works fine at any weight and orientation from tests. Missionary benefits from "on back" and "mating press" when not doing pov stuff.Tail raised/wheelbarrow: Infinitely more consistent compared to anima v1 and illustrious. You likely will get intended result every time unless you're doing something radical. Just don't prompt in pussy and penis if you're doing frontal shots.Intertwined tails: Can be inconsistent, but nothing glaring. Works best as a supplementary tag tbh and not as the core focus. Seems to be most consistent if tagged with "hug", but arms have a tendency to merge together if that is used vertically. Recommended solution is to specifically tag in other things for the mermaids to do with their arms.Finjobs: Don't use this unless you're bold. Chances are, you'll only get weird pussyjobs, tentacle jobs or a normal tailjob if you're lucky. This is what happens when you only manage to find 5 images of the concept and you have a ~75 image dataset at 1400 steps. It's a luxury I even found that many images of it tbh. Not even sure it reacted well at all to the target tags.

Files with SHA256: 7ffe73f52090172b193ff43c942fee7ea1e86bfc12cd9612966fc994381fa287