Update 19.06.2026. Lustify V9 (Zenith) IS OUT! This is the absolute final version of Lustify built on the SDXL architecture. You can find the full changelog and a breakdown of the new features <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/articles/31636/lustify-v9-zenith">there.</a> &lt;---------- <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/2503119">Recommended Workflow</a>.<h3 id="alternative-access-and-support:-outside-of-civitai's-early-access-you-can-get-the-model-via-my-boosty.just-like-last-time-after-the-early-access-ends-there-will-be-a-1-week-period-where-the-model-is-available-for-&quot;on-site-generation-only.&quot;-after-that-it-will-become-available-for-everyone-to-download.-alternatively-you-can-make-a-direct-bitcoin-(btc)-donation-just-make-sure-to-dm-me-after-that:-1comzvrxtrxbz7bczdvxifsjhqhaf1yuzs">Alternative Access &amp; Support: Outside of CivitAI's Early Access, you can get the model via my <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://boosty.to/coyotte">Boosty</a>. Just like last time, after the early access ends, there will be a 1-week period where the model is available for "on-site generation only." After that, it will become available for everyone to download. Alternatively, you can make a direct Bitcoin (BTC) donation, just make sure to DM me after that: <code>1CoMZvrXtRXbz7BCzdvxifSjHqhaf1yUZs</code></h3><h3 id="lustify">LUSTIFY</h3>Lustify is a photoreal checkpoint optimized for creating high-quality imagery of women in explicit/sexual scenarios. The model has been trained on a hybrid dataset, meaning it natively understands both Danbooru tags and natural language prompting.Note: While it has a strong NSFW bias, if you guide it properly, it is fully capable of generating stunning SFW photography, objects, animals, and fantasy environments.<h3></h3><h3 id="crucial-points-before-you-download:">Crucial Points Before You Download:</h3><ol><li>NOT Pony or Illustrious-Based: This is a standard SDXL checkpoint. Do not use Pony/Illustrious LoRAs with it; they will not work correctly.</li><li>Distant Shots &amp; Anatomy Limitations: Like 99% of SDXL models, distant shots can sometimes suffer from distorted faces or hands. This is an inherent limitation of the base technology (4 channel VAE), not the finetune. It is incredibly easy to fix using Inpainting or ADetailer. Please utilize these tools rather than reporting this as a bug.</li><li>Experimental Nature: My training workflow involves a lot of unconventional, high-risk experimentation. Because of this, some prompt combinations that worked perfectly on other checkpoints might behave differently here. If you encounter unexpected behavior, feel free to give feedback so I can look into it.</li></ol> Recomended parameters: Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE/DPM++ 3M SDE, Scheduler: Exponential/Karras Steps: 30 Cfg: 2.5-4.5. Highres.fix: upscale by 1.4-1.5, denoising ~0.4 For the distant shots of people you probably wanna use highres.fix and/or adetailer.Also, use reasonable positive/negative prompts, shizoprompting does more harm than good (with any SDXL model). Some tags that have a big visual impact with this model:<ol><li>Camera type tags: "shot on Polaroid SX-70", "shot on Kodak Funsaver", "shot on GoPro Hero", "shot on Canon EOS 5D", "shot on Leica T".</li><li>Photography styles: "analog photo", "glamour photography", "street fashion photography", "candid photo", "amateur photo".</li><li>Lighting types: "cinematic lighting", "neon lighting", "soft lighting", "dramatic lighting", "low key lighting", "bright flash photography", "warm golden hour lighting", "radiant god rays".</li><li>Film types: "Ilford HP5 Plus", "Lomochrome color film", "Fujicolor Pro".</li><li>Photographers: Alessio Albi, Martin Schoeller, Miles Aldridge, Oleg Oprisco, Tim Walker.</li><li>Others: "film grain", "bokeh", "dreamy haze", "technicolor", "underexposed", "low quality", "lowres"</li></ol>Alternatively, you can give a read to <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/118213/creating-photorealistic-images-with-ai-using-stable-diffusion">this </a>wonderful prompting guide by <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/user/PromptGeek">PromptGeek</a>. It has A LOT of useful tips I didn't know about even after years of using SD.

LUSTIFY! [SDXL NSFW checkpoint]

1) This is my gratitude to everyone supporting me and my work. I truly appreciate you guys! 2) Besides training the model further, I've also made some adjustments - the colors aren't THAT dark by default now compared to V3. 3) In my tests, V4 is the best of all the versions. But that's when it comes to my usage - it may be different for you.

lustifySDXLNSFW_v40Alpha.safetensors

v4.0 alpha

ZENITH (V9)

APEX 🎨INPAINTING🎨

APEX (V8)

GGWP (V7)

OLT 🎨INPAINTING🎨

OLT (FIXED TEXTURES)

OLT (ONE LAST TIME)

ENDGAME ⚡DMD2⚡

ENDGAME

v4.0 ⚡DMD2⚡

v3.0 alpha

v2.0 🎨INPAINTING🎨

v2.0 ⚡LIGHTNING⚡

v2.0 alpha

v1.0 ⚡LIGHTNING⚡

v1.0 alpha

Original Link - <a href="https://civitai.com/models/573152/lustify-sdxl-nsfw-checkpoint" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://civitai.com/models/573152/lustify-sdxl-nsfw-checkpoint</a>Recomended parameters: Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE/DPM++ 3M SDE, Scheduler: Exponential/Karras Steps: 30 Cfg: 2.5-6. Highres.fix: upscale by 1.4-1.5, denoising ~0.4 For the distant shots of people you probably wanna use highres.fix and/or adetailer.Also, use reasonable positive/negative prompts, shizoprompting does more harm than good (with any SDXL model).A photoreal checkpoint, which intended use is creating pictures of women in sexual scenarios. It understands both danbooru tags and natural language prompting, because it was trained like that. It's heavily overtrained on real photos of woman being nude and/or having sex. Yet, if you manage to fight the bias, it can also create gorgeous SFW pics of objects/animals/fantasy creatures/you name it.Some tags that have a big visual impact with this model:<ol><li>Camera type tags: "shot on Polaroid SX-70", "shot on Kodak Funsaver", "shot on GoPro Hero", "shot on Canon EOS 5D", "shot on Leica T".</li><li>Photography styles: "analog photo", "glamour photography", "street fashion photography", "candid photo", "******* photo".</li><li>Lighting types: "cinematic lighting", "neon lighting", "soft lighting", "dramatic lighting", "low key lighting", "bright flash photography", "warm golden hour lighting", "radiant god rays".</li><li>Film types: "Ilford HP5 Plus", "Lomochrome color film", "Fujicolor Pro".</li><li>Photographers: Alessio Albi, Martin Schoeller, Miles Aldridge, Oleg Oprisco, Tim Walker.</li><li>Others: "film grain", "bokeh", "dreamy haze", "technicolor", "underexposed", "low quality", "lowres"</li></ol>

Lustify! V4

Recomended parameters:
Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE/DPM++ 3M SDE,
Scheduler: Exponential/Karras
Steps: 30
Cfg: 2.5-6.
Highres.fix: upscale by 1.4-1.5, denoising ~0.4
For the distant shots of people you probably wanna use highres.fix and/or adetailer.

Also, use reasonable positive/negative prompts, shizoprompting does more harm than good (with any SDXL model).

LUSTIFY!

A photoreal checkpoint, which intended use is creating pictures of women in sexual scenarios. It understands both danbooru tags and natural language prompting, because it was trained like that. It's heavily overtrained on real photos of woman being nude and/or having sex. Yet, if you manage to fight the bias, it can also create gorgeous SFW pics of objects/animals/fantasy creatures/you name it.

A couple of things I need to make clear before you download the checkpoint:

1) All of my stuff is very opinionated. I create models mostly to suit my needs, my workflows, my prompting, etc. The preview images don't represent this, they use very basic prompts to show what the model can do with something really simple.
2) Sometimes you can get bad hands and bad faces at distant shots. These are hard to fix with finetuning, but really easy with inpainting/adetailer. So, please, don't bother me with the complaints about this. Either adapt to the needs of this checkpoint, or use something else (spoiler, 99% of checkpoints suffer from that because of the limitations of this tech).
3) Everything I do is experimental, and I do a lot of dumb-crazy stuff that in theory shouldn't work. So it's to be expected that something, what used to work with other checkpoint for you, might not work with this one. Let me know if there are such things, and I'd see if I can do anything about it.

Some tags that have a big visual impact with this model:

Camera type tags: "shot on Polaroid SX-70", "shot on Kodak Funsaver", "shot on GoPro Hero", "shot on Canon EOS 5D", "shot on Leica T".

Photography styles: "analog photo", "glamour photography", "street fashion photography", "candid photo", "amateur photo".

Lighting types: "cinematic lighting", "neon lighting", "soft lighting", "dramatic lighting", "low key lighting", "bright flash photography", "warm golden hour lighting", "radiant god rays".

Film types: "Ilford HP5 Plus", "Lomochrome color film", "Fujicolor Pro".

Photographers: Alessio Albi, Martin Schoeller, Miles Aldridge, Oleg Oprisco, Tim Walker.

Others: "film grain", "bokeh", "dreamy haze", "technicolor", "underexposed", "low quality", "lowres"

Files with SHA256: 844037941775cf4780d40ca484c736ebafafe781273ab79dad6f8c999824919d