Edit for 4.0 <span style="background-color:rgb(21, 23, 24);color:rgb(194, 189, 181);font-family:-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, &quot;Apple Color Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Emoji&quot;;font-size:16px">More realistic, less bright and saturated though. Still very creative. Not necessarily better than the previous versions, but it offers something different. Edit for V3.5 After several rounds of internal merges, tuning, clip editing, many almost V3 versions, I've ended up further than I thought with what I call version 3.5. It's a general upgrade that fixes many of the issues of the previous V2 and V1 model, and so far I'm not sure what are its flaws. It's real fun to play with, the model is very creative, you often have to get out of its way and let it do its thing, although it will follow prompts closely. Quite good at low inference steps. Minimal prompting, minimal lora use seem to work best. Please share your creations! I love to see them. Edit for V2: V2 is an overall, upgrade. It's more balanced, bolder, more detailed. Subjectively, it's better than V1, but you might think differently and that's legitimate. Original post (V1): This is an NSFW-focused model based on ten rounds of merges. I'd love to give credits, but at this point I've forgotten the contributors, sorry. It'll do SFW, but it'll occasionally generate sexually explicit material on its own, even without a prompt. The goal with this model was creating an Illustrious variant which would make great semi-realistic demi-humans, without a complex prompt, without a complex Lora stack, just the model, and you're good to go. I'm personally pleased with the results, but more than anything, I'm curious about what people think, and how they'll merge it to make something new. If you do use this model for merges, let me know so I can see what you're up to. Just out of curiosity. All the examples images I selected were created with relatively simple prompts, no loras, and in a few second per image. No complex workflows here. I'm 100% sure people will know how to have better results than me with it. One last thing, the model is aimed for and biased to generating mature/adult characters. I cannot advise you strongly enough to not generate minor characters. Don't do anything illegal or amoral with it.

Chaos

This version has some issues but can do incredibly detailed images. The saturation and light is sometimes off, and it's not as creative as the previous ones. Still, when prompted correctly, it can deliver.

Files with SHA256: 92b5facaab4e73b24fc6ac1e9e61405add5c4e39b13de9852d05fa1d0e50db18