<h1 id="illustrious-ver">Illustrious Ver</h1><h3 id="the-sample-images-are-still-analyzing...-give-it-time."><em>The sample images are still analyzing... give it time.</em></h3><p>Just updated to Illustrious. Ignore the weird prompts, I was testing the TIPO extension for Forge. </p><h1 id="pdxl-ver">PDXL Ver</h1><p>It's honestly quite accurate at weight 1.2, but feel free to mess around with the weight some.</p><h3 id="try-the-lora-in-negative-for-some-fun-results-too!-check-below-for-examples."><span style="color:rgb(64, 192, 87)">Try the LoRA in negative for some fun results too! Check below for examples.</span></h3><h1 id="sd-1.5-ver">SD 1.5 Ver</h1><h3 id="note:-large-and-small-breasts-are-easy.-the-secret-to-get-medium-in-the-lora-is-to-just-use-the-&quot;breasts&quot;-tag-without-any-size-specifiers.">NOTE: <br />Large and small breasts are easy. The secret to get medium in the LoRA is to just use the "breasts" tag without any size specifiers.</h3><h2 id="why-doesn't-my-output-look-like-yours">Why doesn't my output look like yours?</h2><ol><li><p>Check the negatives in my examples. Do you have those embeds?</p></li><li><p>I used !ADetailer because it's just a set and forget quality bump.</p></li><li><p>The images were genned at 512x768 then upscaled 1.5 times using 8x_NMKD-Superscale_150000_G with denoising 0.45. You can find it with a quick Google. Note that this upscaler is non-deterministic from my testing so your images may vary slightly. (Check the bottom of this post for info on the cover image.)</p></li></ol><h2 id="settings-and-training:">Settings and Training:</h2><p>Trained on Anything v3<br />Genned on Anything v4.5<br />LoRA weight 0.8</p>

Files with SHA256: dc5a0d354f5b6e934566f5baa26c71abaa664c3eec4606cb46fb2d3dfb6a19bc