<h2 id="test-of-test-of-test-2">Test of test of test 2</h2><h2 id="trigger-words:-f4kepucc0">Trigger words: f4kepucc0</h2><p>And "<span style="color:rgb(250, 82, 82)"><strong>@fakepucco</strong></span>" can activate Anima's built-in art style.</p><hr /><h3 id="lora-based-on-fakepucco's-art-style-is-primarily-used-to-adjust-the-built-in-art-style-of-checkpoint.">LoRa based on Fakepucco's art style, is primarily used to adjust the built-in art style of checkpoint.</h3><p></p><p>First of all, it should be noted that whether it is Illustrious or Anima, the art style of fakepucco is already built into the checkpoint.</p><h3 id="however-in-anima-it-seems-that-the-style-of-the-artist's-early-works-is-too-dominant-which-sometimes-makes-the-generated-results-look-a-bit-strange.">However, in Anima, it seems that the style of the artist's early works is too dominant, which sometimes makes the generated results look a bit strange.</h3><p></p><p>So I selected some recent works by the artist and mixed them with a small number of earlier works for training. The result was similar to what I expected. Using LORA while activating the built-in artist style of Checkpoint with @fakepucco will make the result show the style of the artist's middle period.</p><h3 id="this-lora-can-be-used-alone-but-it-is-recommended-to-use-it-with-the-prompt-&quot;@fakepucco&quot;.">This lora can be used alone, but it is recommended to use it with the prompt "<span style="color:rgb(250, 82, 82)"><strong>@fakepucco</strong></span>".</h3><p></p><p>Because this was only for testing, only 50 images were used for training, resulting in weak generalization ability.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, many of this artist's works depict a certain fetish, but the built-in parameters of checkpoint struggle to generate such content correctly. LoRa can help improve this issue. In the example image, a <strong>ROPE</strong> is used to represent the fetish.</p><hr /><p>About the Illustrious version, since the style of this artist built into Checkpoint works well in all aspects, it's unnecessary. (Activating it in Illustrious does not require the "@" symbol.)</p>

Files with SHA256: eca50d1a5ae7b1f1a06a08c9c7e92085cf45fb8bf985fb14b6fdd0c1cc3edb52