<h2 id="heading-5260">FWSweet v1 - Two Versions: Stable &amp; Style.</h2>This is a mix blatantly based on <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/18927/sweet-mix">Sweetmix v2.2-flat</a>. That has good anatomy and compatibility, but I don't like the style. I want to make a mix that has most of the good anatomy but with a style I like, and here it is! I posted many comparisons, most pictures on both versions are same parameters. Pick your favorite version!<h3 id="heading-5261">FWSweet v1 Stable</h3>This model has good compatibility but not a strong style like the "Style" version. It's better for LORAs with stronger pollution and other style LORAs.<h3 id="heading-5262">FWSweet v1 Style</h3>This version has more style, but sometimes isn't as good. It's bad with some character LORAs that aren't perfect. But when this model is good it is better than "Stable".I switch between both often. Sometimes a good seed idea happens on Style but something is bad, so I switch and do it on Stable same seed and it's perfect. Sometimes the other way."Why not a style LORA and not base model?" Convenience. I like it this way more. I want good base to always have the same.<h3 id="heading-5263">Suggested Use</h3>Negative Prompt: extra fingers, fewer fingers, bad-hands-5, by bad-artist, (bad eyes:1.2), (misfigured pupils:1.2), (bad clothing:1.3), (undetailed clothing:1.3), ng_deepnegative_v1_75t, verybadimagenegative_v1.3, (nonsensical backrounds:1.2), (bad backrounds:1.2), (bad shadows:1.2), (bad anatomy:1.1)(Get embeddings from <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/18927/sweet-mix">Sweetmix page</a>)

Files with SHA256: f14da77de8800292edd9c10e36db37054b17f1f55966bea930ec1e11276d42f7