CivArchive
    Preview 56049421
    Preview 56049417
    Preview 56049419
    Preview 56049722
    Preview 56049757

    You can use two of my models for online generation on Tensor Art:
    Illustrious version 3
    NAI version

    But if you want to use this model here on Civit, then consider bidding some buzz to make it available on the generator!
    I will bid all the buzz I get from all of you using the model! (If I remember.)
    Current bid: 750 buzz on NAI V-Pred

    NoobAI version:

    I wanted to be part of the cool gang and hop on the NAI v-pred craze. Here's what I cooked up.

    As with any of these models, use Euler or Euler A samplers. Comfy user should use ModelSamplingDiscrete and set it to v-prediction. I'll add more info here as I continue to research but for now, resources.

    You can find CSV files filled with tags the model understands here. Both danbooru and e621. Which... just means prompting like you would an Illustrious model.

    Illustrious LoRA models can break contrast and saturation, but they should work. Please report any issues you find.

    ComfyUI users can use the example workflow here. Just drag the image into comfy to open the workflow.

    General guide for using NoobAI models effectively.

    Illustrious version:

    Triple model merge. It's a first merge attempt, but it came out alright I'd say. Understands Danbooru and e621 tags.

    It's an EPS model but it seems to work fine without EPS sampling, but I'd still recommend you use the correct settings for whichever tool you use. (ComfyUI/A1111/etc.)

    I do not use A1111, but for ComfyUI you have to use the node ModelSamplingDiscrete or an equivalent custom node and set it to EPS sampling.

    Use Euler A sampler, ~25-40 steps and ~4-8 guidance scale (CFG).

    Positive Illustrious prompts:

    (subject, {1boy/1girl/2boys/2girls/etc.}, artist/style).
    
    Describe image with natural language. {A portrait of ...}.
    
    (tags, quality tags).

    Negative Illustrious prompts:

    bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, sketch, censor.

    Pony version:

    Test model, I wanted to see if merging two of my favorite models would increase prompt adherence while still keeping its imagination.

    It has a bit of a watermark problem, but they don't seem to be too intrusive and are usually easily fixed with a bit of inpainting.

    Positive Pony prompts:

    score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, rating_tag, BREAK

    Negative Pony prompts:

    score_6, score_5, score_4, etc.

    But please experiment, I'd love to hear your thoughts!

    Description

    Subjectively improved the style. If it wasn't obvious, I like 2D/2.5D styles. This'll probably be my last update of this model unless I somehow vastly improve upon it. I hope you like it!

    Includes VAE just like last version, but not required. Same prompt structure.

    FAQ

    Checkpoint
    Illustrious

    Details

    Downloads
    1,154
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    2/5/2025
    Updated
    4/22/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.