Thanks for the feedback, Mr. Username!

I have to say that this comment is interesting to be reading on a site dedicated to generating and sharing SD images, as well as providing the tools for others to generate them. Checking your own post profile, just as an example, there seems to be a large number of number of images of nude men, and I'd be willing to bet that at least some of the data used to create those images came from pictures of real human beings who might even still be alive today. If you feel this strongly about potentially violating the privacy and dignity of this men, you should consider removing these generated images. Perhaps even research the methods by which the checkpoints used to create them were generated, find the individuals violated in such a manner by having their photographic data used, and offer a personal apology.

As for me, I don't pretend that any of this is ethical in the slightest. I simply abide by the TOS of this site, by specifying that I didn't use images of a real, specific person in generating my training images. The shady nature of all this is the reason that the only box I uncheck when uploading these embeddings is the one that indicates you can sell my models on other sites. I have no intention of profiting from any of this or allowing anyone else to; it's just something I do for fun. The way I "crumble down the line" is the day when I say, "Meh, I'm bored of this. Time to go back to playing Brotato in my spare time." I am not an artist, and I have no illusions of such. I just liked some of the characters I made for the story I'm writing and wanted to share the embeddings I use to render them, and decided to create some more people just because I enjoy the process.

If that's a problem for you, I understand, but at the same time it raises the obvious question raised by one Mr. Braff on a sitcom years ago: "Where do you think we are?"