Welcome to Perfection Amateur!
This is an Illustrious XL merge with a bunch of hand-selected checkpoints and LoRAs to improve the base model's realistic capabilites.
This is a special branch-off for cinematic flavor and for when you need your images to be extra juicy and well-lit!
It's focus is on creating high quality, photorealistic but amateur style images with a focus on women.
Each sample/preview image contains the used workflow. Here's a quick article with simpler more beginner-friendly workflow. This is a recommended starting point.
Do not use the Normal scheduler. Use Simple or Beta!
Use euler_a, dpmpp_2m_sde or dpmpp_3m_sde as your sampler.
To use the faster low-step settings, you need to use the DMD2 LoRA. This allows you to use 8 or 16 steps and generate very fast. Remember to generate in 2 passes, either using "Hires fix" in Forge/A1111, or by creating and chaining a second sampler node in ComfyUI. A sample workflow if included in the sample images of the model. Use this as a reference.
Recommended Settings
Base Generation
Steps: 30
CFG-scale: 3
Sampler: DPM++ 3M SDE
Scheduler: Simple (beta upscale scheduler)
Upscale/Refine
Steps: 16
CFG-scale: 4
Sampler: DPM++ 3M SDE
Scheduler: Simple
Denoise: 0.35
Description
Even more amateur style!
FAQ
Comments (28)
It's completely impossible to generate males
An SFW Illustrious model. Haha. Still cant make porn, only with loras. Choose another model to merge.
yooo make this model usable on civitai cuh
That's not how that works anymore.
Anyone can bid on a model to be on the generator.
There's a green "Bid"-button on a model, press it and choose how much you want to contribute to a model being on the generator. If the model fails to reach the top 200 bidded models, the buzz will be returned.
@6tZ so can i use your model on civit if I bought buzz or did something? i really wanna use your model can you tell what I should do?
@faconep255819 There is a button on the model page which says: "Bid". Do you see that?
If you click that, you will get to a page where you can choose how much money to contribute towards this model being on the generator. If it reaches the top 200 models on the site with bids, it will be on the generator.
If it gets enough love by people contributing, I Will also contribute to it of course as it shows that people want to see it on the generator.
@6tZ ohh so what if it doesnt reach in top 200? it gets taken off?
@faconep255819 Correct!
Usually requires 7000-10000 buzz each week to have it on generator.
With so many models and versions, I cannot sponsor it all, it's just too costly. I need to know which people want the most, and the best of doing that is by helping me with the sponsoring of the models. I'm happy to go halfsies.
@6tZ but isnt 200 bidders too much? is there any way like i can bid 5k sum buzz and have it on?
@6tZ ohhh i get it i get it so its about getting the model in top 200 to be on the generator, so if I bid for it to be in 200 before the auction ends and the model finishes in top 200 does that mean only I can generate pictures on it or anyone can and lets say i bid on it and it ends up in under 200, will there be more auctions for it in future like this?
@faconep255819 Sorry, if you spend 10 bucks for 1 model per week, you better generate locally. Dont be idiot.
@irvinkrrish106 Not everyone has a GPU. And the cost can be shared. If 20 people really want the model, maybe everyone can add $0.5 and then it's on the generator?
@faconep255819 You got it correctly! Anyone can bid any amount. If you look at the top bid models, they are at over 100k buzz, which means people are paying $100 or more to have them exposed to the top. Usually the lower end of the top 200 are paying ~7000-10000 buzz.
If the model ends up in top 200, EVERYONE will get access. So it's a shared community thing thing.
This voting is always on, and it's "reset" the night between Thursday and Friday at GMT+0 (UK time). So every thursday night we switch which top 200 models are available for on-site generation.
Flux generation is not available.
@6tZ I know, but always the creators bid them mostly. For 100 bucks you get a very competent gpu (second hand) for xl models.
@6tZ i would like to bid on your model and I will on the last day if you wanna help feel free
@faconep255819 Cheers and thank you for the support.
Feel free to bid earlier so I don't miss out on seeing it.
Remember: If the model is not on the generator (i.e. not top 200), you get all the buzz refunded.
It's a shame there's no way to see who helps contribute to models and give them credit if they want to be credited. Maybe in the future.
@6tZ i really wanted to get this model in top 200 and I did deposit cash in an exchange but they just wont let me transfer to another crypto wallet, sorry bro I really need this model and I tried but my fuckass country just have many regulations on crypto, am sorry i couldn't contribute to this
@pewh8640599 Not to worry! There will be more opportunities in the future!
Hopefully Civit gets their credit card scanner working again at some point :)
At some point I will update the one on Seaart:
https://www.seaart.ai/models/detail/81c34c554627ef3a6913c633a72824c0
Then you can always generate there?
@6tZ yea i hope they enable card payments soon, the seaart is like forcefully downgrading the image like making it all good but then the quality is like rainy texture
How can you make them not ass blurry/grainy?
Edit: Got it. 1024x1536 -Dpm-sde-40 steps -cfg4 - no negative prompt/ tthen send to img-img cfg1 - den 0.1
Hmm, sounds like some extreme problem, other models are working fine?
Make sure you are not using Karras as the sampler.
one thing i don't understand, if it is a model based on illustrious, why do you use the score tags like "score_9,score_8_up) and no illustrious tags,(masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,etc)?, isn't that supposed to be for pony models, or is that also mixed with some pony model.
You got it, this has pony pieces merged in it. For good and bad :)
I don't always use them, but currently I have it in my "pre-prompt" setup.
They are absolutely not necessary for quality though, so I should probably remove them to confuse people less.
this model cannot generate a masculine image even with all imaginable masculine tags
Yep, it's completely mistagged. Author is aware, but still uses "Gay" and "Homo" tags, even without generating any images showcasing such content.
I wish either the author just full-on removed that tag, at least from v2 cause that's what I've tested with. Or, they generate content to match the tags to showcase it working, since they're confident enough to tag it as such.
It can definitely generate men, but it's not great at male on male action. It usually switches out one of the characters for a woman. I'll remove the tags not to confuse people. When I test it with these tags I mostly get male on male action with mussies, which is not intentional.
Thanks for the feedback, I'll try to incorporate proper male in future versions before adding the tags back again. If you notice similar behavior in my other models, I'd really appreciate the feedback.
The upcoming version 2.2 is mostly similar unfortunately, just slightly better.
I'll make sure to improve this in future versions.
@6tZ Thanks for being receptive to feedback, I'd love to give your checkpoints another shot in the future once they're trained on male on male content. I think I've also tried your Cinematic model too, it also somewhat struggles but it's a lot better at male/male than your Amateur checkpoint.
@MysticFrostwind Happy to help. My focus is on the female, but I would like the models to be better for everyone.
Meanwhile, maybe check out my Pulsar model (Flux)?
Or the latest version of Fluxed Up or Fux Capacity. They are both getting decent males (sometimes) now.
Details
Files
Available On (2 platforms)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.