This is a merge of some of the best (in my opinion) models on Civitai, with some loras, and a touch of magic. 🪄😏
Some of the images were generated with 1 clip skip
Recommended settings:
Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE or 3M SDE or 2M with Karras or Exponential
CFG: 5 - 8
Steps: 30+
Some of the checkpoints I merged:
AlbedoBase XL
⋅ ⊣ Realities Edge XL ⊢ ⋅
Realistic Freedom - SFW and NSFW
Explicit Freedom - NSFW Waifu
Colossus Project XL
WoW_XL
Some of the loras I merged:
LUT Diffusion XL
DetailedEyes_XL
NSFW POV All In One SDXL
Envy Cute XL 04
Perfect Eyes XL
🪄 The final touch of magic is that I used multiple "bad loras" with negative strength to push the model toward greater "goodness".
Description
Better at human anatomy and in different positions
Better hands
Better photography
Easier to make skinny females
Added:
Capability XL
Iris Lux
more loras (including negatives)
Images are more accurate to the prompt with 1 clip skip, but text and small details may get ruined.
This checkpoint would be v6.2 if I uploaded all of the versions I have made. Hence, the file name says 6.2.
FAQ
Comments (45)
I just ran an exhaustive comparison of 55 NSFW photorealistic SDXL checkpoints looking for things like prompt obedience, anatomical correctness, and various aesthetic factors, and found that House of Freyja - Ire's Mix was the pretty clear #1.
Runners-up included Better Than Words v20 and v30, Capability XL, Luna Mia v50, and Ultrium v4, in no particular order.
I was not able to get Freyja to do anything I wanted, at least not with natural language prompts.
@snipsnapsnipsnap that's not surprising really, ranking checkpoints is very subjective no matter what. we need to find checkpoints that "speak our own language". i tried to be as generalized as possible but inevitably there will be big differences in user experience.
I tend to disagree as well. House of Freyja gives the skin an airbrushed look - you can even see it in the previews. Much less skin detail than this model
ive heard a checkpoint named realistic freedom was the best
@rime11 in my tests realistic freedom did well in everything except prompt obedience. it seems to produce great stuff but rarely what is actually asked for
@shapeshifter83 Did you try CinEro XL v1.3 Handsome? This version had a focus on anatomy correctness.
sounds interesting, do you have a link to that.
@homoludens i did download it as soon as it came out but I haven't had a chance to really try it out. planning to
@twistedlegs https://civitai.com/models/151568
@shapeshifter83 if you will make a merge with cinero use elemental merge and try to find out which elements affect hands first. This is the main problem currently. Other things can be easily fixed by some loras.
Maybe upload some of your results to the Freya page. There's nothing there that looks interesting at the moment.
Seems like in V3 women are often anorexic compared to v2. A 21 year old woman in a bikini should have a ribcage, but in v3 it seems like something is making the torso longer and I am counting ribs.
Did you find out how to avoid the long torso?
@edwin0815 Long torsos can have to do with the size of your output, try changing the dimensions and total size (pixel count)
Really better than words, keep up with the good work!
Best NFSW model ever. Inpainting is awesome
Can you explain how did you create inpainting model version please? 😁
@TimNekk SDXL has no inpainting model. So use Fooocus to get inpainting feature, it's far better than SD1.5 inpainting
one of the best modells every
can this make footjobs without loras?
I try new models all the time, but there are a few I keep going back to. I know there's a lot of NSFW in the gallery here, but I find it is overall consistent and has a good look to it. It delivers.
I'm not sure why but for me this checkpoint often give me deform bodies, I've tried swapping dimensions, samling method, sampling steps, cfg, using different negative embeddings or changing the prompt but its very often it gives me an extra leg or make the whole body deform.
So, I discovered some things, I failed to recreate some of the authors images because i am using auto1111 and they are using comfy, it seems comfy uses the cpu instead of the gpu to generate the seed noise and the way the 2 systems weigh words are also different so it seems that if you want to use this checkpoint you should try it out on comfyui
The author said he merged some "loras", how do I use each of them? Or is this "built in" to the model? For example, in version 3 said that the "DetailedEyes" lora was built in, do I need to use some term to apply it or are all generated images generated using this lora? Was my question clear?
not all loras require trigger words. when a lora is merged with checkpoint, it means that what the trained lora had learnt was passed on to the main model. detailed eyes has no trigger word, so the lora will apply automatically.
@aiaicaptain Does that mean, if you didn't know what went into training the LoRA, and you used both Detailed eyes and this one, you might end up with funky results?
Very good model to easily get great results!
gret for nsfw, very sexual. The creepy creepy creepy shit from v2 is gone, thank god
wha ya mean creepy?
@ebony3d The second version produces images with faces that looked way too fucking young. It was really fucking creepy and I would encourage CivitAI to remove it from the website. I believe the pedophiles on this website are finding more and more clever ways to get around filters, and version 2 of this model is one of them.
Thanx for this model, it produces very well. what I want
This model is easy, versatile, and integrates well. Thank you for all the updates.
one question why at the last step my image become completly blue and ugly when at 98 it's looking really nice ? what i miss ?
this is related to your sampler, which you've probably already discovered since that was 11 days ago.
And also, you're being fooled by the image preview window in A1111. It's actually borked generation from the start, but the image preview window is showing you something different. Remember, the image preview in A1111 DOES NOT sample from the ongoing image being generated; it's a rough approximation from a totally different (and far cheaper) system running concurrently to try to give you the illusion of a progress window for the main job.
@shapeshifter83 hello
but my image at the end is blue not during the process ! so i dont know what i should do as i stop using it at the moment cause of this
i will try again later but thanks anyway for the answer
@rafa66 your image is blue throughout the entire process, the preview window is tricking you. The preview window isn't real. It has nothing to do with the final step at all. Try a few different samplers until it stops doing it, or possibly ensure you're running a good VAE (not the SDXL original, something like the fp16 fix or Sharp Spectrum).
@shapeshifter83 ok i'll try thanks
@shapeshifter83 That's an interesting insight. I suppose if that's the case in A1111, it's probably also the case in other packages like comfyui and fooocus, right? And here was I thinking I was watching the actual progress of the sampler.
@Janos_Thanatos I honestly have no idea if that's the case for other platforms, I only know A1111 personally.
It's the VAE, the other guy had no idea what he was talking about unfortunately. Hopefully you figured it out by now.
@ShencilLizard am i the "other guy that has no idea what he's talking about"? He didn't mention blue dots, nor did he mention NaN errors or completely black images, which is why I focused on getting him to stop trusting the image preview instead of immediately calling it a VAE issue. Even then, I did mention possible VAE issues in my second reply.
So what exactly is it that makes me "not know what I'm talking about"? You just saw him mention blue in his images and went straight to "other guy is an idiot, it's VAE", but he didn't actually mention orbs or dots, and have you ever seen or heard of a VAE issue causing a "completely blue and ugly" image? I haven't.
Your model is a real great job! But due to all refinements, LoRAs trained against a SDXL base model do not work well on your model. Therefor I started to create for each of my LoRA a special version version trained against your model, to get better results with your model.
But I think, this shows just, that your model is different to base models, and I like that!
Lovely model! rly enjoy using it. Anybody have some tips on how to get 2 different looking woman? Been trying a lot of things but they always end up looking like eachother
Does a great job with female figures, but can't make a man or penis. "Naked man standing in a park with his penis showing" gives a mostly-male figure with a vagina.
Like, trans power and all that, but also I kinda wanted what I asked it for











