CivArchive
    Artofura | Furry mix - Illustrious++ - v4.0
    NSFW
    Preview 123886356
    Preview 123886381
    Preview 123886369
    Preview 123886373
    Preview 123886383
    Preview 123886385
    Preview 123886374
    Preview 123886380
    Preview 123886376
    Preview 123886375
    Preview 123886378
    Preview 123886371
    Preview 123886367

    Artofura

    About this model

    I initially made this model because I wanted to concilliate the positive sides from Illustrious and YiffyMix, and to avoid negative aspects found in them in the proccess.

    Recommended settings:

    • Steps: 22-28

    • Sampler: Euler A

    • CFG: 3-6

    • CLIP Skip: 2

    LoRAs

    LoRAs can be trained and used the same as Illustrious. Pony LoRAs should work as well but require a bit further testing on my part.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (3)

    krazycrisJun 9, 2026
    CivitAI

    For some reason it now says it’s unavailable for me to use.

    oilio2
    Author
    Jun 9, 2026

    It's because the of the bid system. It should be back thursday night

    ChocolemurJun 19, 2026
    CivitAI

    I'm testing artofura since a few time and I like it a lot. The drawing is neat and it obey the prompt pretty well (I post on DeviantArt).

    Even if of course it's still an SDXL/Illustrious and there is still blending between characters and, particularly, bias about species : wolf female + rabbit male is still horribly hard to do, often impossible (I generate locally, and I see the image following the prompt at start, and the two characters being "corrected" away from the prompt in real time).

    Another point is the "signature" bias. When the engine decide to generate some "signature" (generally in the bottom-right of the image, in white "letters"), it's basically impossible to get rid of it.

    Also, it's pretty sensible to negative point :
    { |

    text, watermark, signature, jpeg artifacts, bad hands, extra fingers, unfinished, oldest, early |

    unfinished, oldest, early

    }
    in negative with Dynamic Prompt.
    The two last are vastly superior in quality.
    The second one has a more cartoonish character.
    The last one is basically like the first one - nearly identical - but just better "drawn".
    Even the second can't, more of the time, get rid of the "white signature" when it's there.

    Here the Forge Neo parameters :
    _________
    solo, furry, anthro, (white body fur:1.2), long blonde hair, purple eyeliner, long blonde tail, light blue eyes,
    beautiful large breasts,, slender, affectionate smile, open mouth,
    blue frilled bikini, black frills,
    fishing, holding fishing rod,
    masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, cinematic lighting, dramatic shadow, fluffy_fur, vibrant color, dramatic shadow
    small river, 3d animation
    Negative prompt: { |
    text, watermark, signature, jpeg artifacts, bad hands, extra fingers, unfinished, oldest, early |
    unfinished, oldest, early
    }
    Steps: 30, Sampler: DPM++ 2M, Schedule type: Karras, CFG scale: 5, Seed: 1524084252, Size: 1088x1472, Model: artofuraFurryMix_v40, Model hash: 3a9b064271, RNG: GPU, Emphasis: Original, Version: neo-2.24
    ____________

    Dynamic prompt activated with combinational generation and fixed seed.

    Checkpoint
    Illustrious

    Details

    Downloads
    1,513
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    3/12/2026
    Updated
    7/28/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    artofuraFurryMix_v40.safetensors

    Mirrors

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.