Please support the original creator (Bkbbkbkk).
This model is not intended to inconvenience the original creator, it will be deleted on request.
I hope you like it.
Illustrious model
Recommended settings:
lora weight: 0.8~1
sampler: euler a
scheduler: Automatic (sgm_uniform/normal)
steps: 30
CFG: 5.0-7.0
All images in the showcase were rescaled using Ultimate SD Upscale (4xAnimesharp).
Description
This model was trained with WAI-NSFW-illustrious-SDXL v14.0
FAQ
Comments (10)
I just got 1 strike for “minor” content, for many images of my past loras, I guess I will stop sharing loras because most of the images are not even nswf, I don't want to get blocked. Looks like here small breast = minor
I also appealed for some images and it was accepted, but even those were removed again, I better avoid the risk.
Thank you for the loras! Stay safe!
If the style makes characters look youthful or petite, and you mix it with small proportions, it's just going to happen. Not all small chest = minor but expect to take style into context and not purely intent.
@Galerd well, you're not alone - I got a strike on YouTube 2 days ago, for leaking demon slayer infinity castle movie teaser 🙊
@cookiecat You're right about that. The only thing I don't understand is why they're blocking images again that had already accepted my appeal and they're giving me a strike for it.
@Galerd I recently had the exact same issue, and have appealed one of the images. Can I ask how long it took for you to get a response, as I have now been waiting for 6 days, and have heard nothing back from them
@Grim0r they take their time and for some images don't even give me an answer, the few that I received an answer I simply receive notification that the appeal was accepted about a week later, but as I mentioned when I got my strike they blocked those images again, all nonsense.
yeah but also blatantly using a model trained off an artist that exclusively draws toddlers getting fucked probably also contributes lmfao so?????
Awesome style!