Illustrious Renaissance v6_NS Update
First things first: all the preview images you see here are pure Text-to-Image (t2i). No LoRAs, no Hires.fix, and no Face Detailer were used. What you see is exactly what the model can do out of the box.
Sorry for the silence! This update took a bit longer than I expected, but it’s because v6_NS is a total game-changer for the model's future.
I’ve been spending a ton of time in the "lab" experimenting and training text encoders from various models. The goal? To bake in enough flexibility so you can use your favorite LoRAs without headaches.
What does this mean for you? The model is now a bit of a hybrid. I’ve tuned it to be compatible with almost everything: SDXL, Illustrious, and Pony. I’ve also started adding support for Noob—some things already work, and full compatibility is next on my list.
It’s a work in progress: Is it 100% perfect? Not yet. But it’s finally at a point where it plays nice with a huge variety of LoRAs, and I wanted to get it into your hands as soon as possible.
I need your eyes on this! Try it out, break it, and please share your feedback and images. I really need to know how it’s performing for you so I can keep polishing it in the next updates.
Enjoy the new versatility! I hope you like it. —DeViLDoNia
⭐ Illustrious Renaissance
Quick Start: For v5 and earlier versions
Recommended Sampler: euler, euler_ancestral, dpm++ 2m
Steps: 30+
CFG: 3.5–7 (5 recommended for most cases)
Clip Skip: 2
Hires Fix / FaceDetailer: Strongly recommended
Resolution: 1152x1536 / 1024x1536 / 832x1216 / 896x1152
Recommended Upscaler: 4x_NomosWebPhoto_RealPLKSR.pth
Upscale Factor: ×1.5–×4 (depending on your hardware)
Trigger Words: For v5 and earlier versions
realistic_skin_texture, realistic, realistic_detail, detailed_background
Positive Prompt Example:
masterpiece, best quality, YOUR PROMPT, realistic_skin_texture, realistic_detail, detailed_background
Negative Prompt:
worst quality, low quality
Enjoy and give me all your love: like, follow, review, post, it helps a lot.
~ DeViLDoNia
📧 Business Contact:
For commercial inquiries, collaborations or licensing, please contact:
📩 email: [email protected] / Discord: hades5826
Description
Enhanced Quality Output
Stable 1536p generation
FAQ
Comments (3)
should we stick with v4 if we're not generating at "1536p" ?
You can use v5 without any problems. It's more stable at 1536p than v4, but it produces very good images at lower resolutions such as 896x1152, 832x1216, and 1024x1024. I haven't tested it at lower resolutions, but it should work just as well at 768x1024.
IR v5 seems like a fairly substantial improvement overall versus v4, even at the usual SDXL-sized resolutions. Image quality, realism, lighting, adherence - just about everything seems better imo.
Very nice work @DeViLDoNia and thanks for sharing!


















