This model is great for people who like their men to have a little bit higher of an estrogen level affecting their chest. This gives the men you generate a more "average" looking chest that is more representative of the general population.

What version is best for me?

v1.0 Regular - this works best in most cases. It respects the rest of the image and supports many other LoRAs (as long as they don't overly modify the chest area). It's biggest drawback is that it might produce unrealistic nipples sometimes. Disfigurement and poor anatomy are the lowest with this version. Version 1.0 handles different ethnicities a bit better.

v1.0 HD (High Detail/Higher Epoch) - this works best for up close shots, or if you don't care about the rest of the image being altered as much. It produces the most realistic nipples at the cost of bleeding some of the training data over into the image. There isn't a huge difference between the regular and high detail models.

v0.5 - this was the original version of this LoRA and produces realistic nipples, although with varying size. This version will apply the most "haze" to your image. It also alters the rest of the image the most and doesn't play as nice with other LoRAs. It's the most useful for up close shots that might be a little overbaked.

Additional Info

It has been tested primarily with the euler sampler with a simple or beta scheduler

Works well with flux.1 Dev ultra real fine tune and flux.1 dev regular

LoRA strength should be between 0.4 - 1.0, but it does work with values over 1.0. The "intensity" of the effect is proportionate to the strength of the LoRA.

I used between 25 - 40 steps

I've tested with many image sizes and haven't seen any issues.

Notes

This works on all-sized men. The more husky the man, the more the nipples will just be large and appear like "moobs". For leaner men, they will appear more puffy and conical. The effect works well on bodybuilders/muscular men too.

"man-with-gyno" is the trigger phrase that should be added.