@eldisss yes, of course I'm commenting on the new version. How am I suppose to know which version you're talking about in the comment below the images?

@eldisss Look I'm not a robot. Please don't talk down to me and please don't tell me to read everything everywhere. Accept that people read what's in front of them and that they expect that text below images refers to those images. Your English isn't that great so take some responsibility for that and accept that people aren't going to get your intentions if you speak in half sentences, because they can't read your mind.

@eldisss  Don't accuse me of being 'passive aggressive' when every one of your responses to me has been outright aggressive! My initial comment was meant supportively. You responded 'Agree to disagree' clearly stating a position of aggression, an implied argument. You only had to reply that the older version was asian looking. If you update your lora you should update the description. what else do you expect from people? Calm down, man. Nobody attacked you but, I will stand up for myself. Stand down and chill out.

@eldisss I'm dyslexic, it isn't a crime to want to make what you're intention was more clear and I have a tendency to repeat myself. So I have edited my text. You had that option too. The beauty of writing is being able to take your time to make your intention clear. I am not ashamed of anything I've written and I stand by it. 'Agree to disagree' is nothing but aggressive when it's you're opening line!?
'I'm telling you shut up, I have no intention of entering into any diplomatic discussion,' is what it means.
In all my life that phrase has never been a friendly, calm thing to say. It is by it's nature '[passive] aggressive' (there is nothing passive about it) especially when used as a first reply to someone wanting to be supportive! I am not acting out of anger but, I will defend myself and call out hypocrisy. I will also stay well away from you since you've shown no attempt to 'chill the fuck out'.