Patricia Mac Sionnach - FOX-POP
Activation: Check trigger words
Reinforcement Tags: animal ears, breasts,furry, furry female, fox tail, freckles, tail, fox ears, bangs, twin braids, orange hair, green eyes, body fur, braid, fox girl, orange fur, hair tie, animal nose, twintails, two-tone fur,fox girl, fangs, sneakers
For her Outfit: Use your Imagination
Disclamer: This isn't a style; it's just the character.
This character was designed by FOX-POP, so if you appreciate their work, don't forget to show your support. Checking out their creations and offering encouragement helps them continue to produce great content for everyone to enjoy.
Reviews and criticism are appreciated
The tags shown in the descriptions are from the most recent model. If you want to use tags from previous models, I recommend checking the tags on the image itself instead of relying on the description.
If you have any character suggestions, just leave a comment or send a DM via Civitai chat.
Description
FAQ
Comments (8)
Hey, the artist whose work you've drawn from for this, Fox-Pop, is enduring a lot of turmoil now from people copying their likeness and sharing it without their involvement. Fox-Pop doesn't want you to make AI models of their style, it's hard enough to survive as an artist beside the competition that AI generations now offer, let alone ones that specifically mimic your character and art style, and Fox-Pop is having a particularly hard time now due to this.
I understand the desire to preserve and play with styles that you like, but this artist is still alive and they've expressed that they don't want their work or their likeness used in AI content. Do you see how doing that is kind of a jab at the artist for trying to survive as an artist, or how impersonating their style to this degree kind of guts them of all the effort they went through to refine it? Did you know that people are making copycat social media accounts pretending to be Fox-Pop in order to scrape clicks and commissions from users who like Fox-Pop's work, and that they're using your model to do this? Doing this against the artist's will in these circumstances is enough of a "haha fuck you" that it can't rationally be respected, you know?
How about we all just agree that Fox-Pop's art rules and leave it there? AI models based on it aren't appropriate, the artist has said as much. Thank you, I hope you understand.
Sorry, don't feel bad for the rest of your life or anything, (I know what that's like) kindly just take it down and move on.
This LoRA isn't intended to replicate an artist's style; it simply captures the essence of the character. AI can't genuinely mimic the unique style of an artist. Avoiding specific styles because it might upset the artist is counterproductive. Such a restriction prevents the artist from exploring and improving their own artistic abilities, ultimately limiting their growth and development. Furthermore, allowing for the free use of various styles encourages creativity and innovation, providing artists with the opportunity to learn, adapt, and evolve in their craft. It's important to embrace this freedom to foster artistic progress and refinement, even in the face of AI-generated art.
Also, I am not doing this for money; my interest lies in the exploration of AI, which I find intellectually stimulating. This technology represents a significant shift in our future, and its evolution is inevitable, whether we welcome it or not. While the rapid advancement of AI comes with many concerns and challenges, I believe it is crucial to engage with it now to understand its potential impacts fully. By doing so, we can better navigate the complexities and ethical considerations that accompany the integration of AI into our lives and creative processes.
I am particularly drawn to the way AI can reshape creative expression, offering new tools and methods that were previously unimaginable. However, I am also aware of the discomfort and uncertainty that AI's growing presence can cause, especially among artists. It's a double-edged sword: while AI provides exciting opportunities for innovation, it also raises questions about authenticity and the future of human creativity.
Many artists do use AI for financial gain, leveraging these technologies to enhance their work and generate income. While I understand and respect their choice, my motivation is different. My work with AI is not driven by financial incentives but by a desire to explore and understand these emerging technologies. Additionally, I enjoy creating lewd LoRAs, which adds a unique and personal dimension to my experimentation with AI.
I see this as an opportunity to stay ahead of the curve, to critically assess the benefits and drawbacks of AI, and to contribute to the broader conversation about its role in our society. This engagement is not just about embracing AI for its novelty but about preparing for a future where AI is an integral part of our daily lives and creative endeavors.
@Bolivante "Avoiding specific styles because it might upset the artist is counterproductive." Dear, avoiding drawing other artists' characters in circumstances the artist isn't comfortable with is common courtesy. It's not for you to say what's good for this artist, they don't want their character reproduced by AI, they removed their art from DeviantArt when it said it was going to sample from their art, they really don't want you to allow people to impersonate their characters this way, it's harming this person.
Pursuit of larger freedom and growth no matter the casualties doesn't come off as noble when you're exploiting a specific innocent person. Fox-Pop doesn't want people using their characters for this, I'll say again that people right now are making social media accounts impersonating Fox-Pop and muddying their name by ripping off commissioners who think they are Fox-Pop, and they are using your model to do this.
Also, for furry artists in particular their characters are frequently their identities. Imagine yourself in my position having to beg an uploader of a deepfake of your real-life body to halt the social damage that they're causing you, and if you scroll down the page the gallery is full of haunting user images of your face doing things that sicken you, because with the effort barrier gone a lot of people are going to abuse your image, and those sickening pictures of you are going to be shared everywhere and people are going to recognize you by them, so you no longer have any control over what you're associated with.
We can't control what users do, but we can refrain ourselves from helping them do it to specific innocent people.
@ToweringToska By your logic, fan art would be considered wrong. If the creator of a character doesn't want fan art to be made, then it shouldn't have been posted online in the first place. Fan art falls under free use, so if Disney wants to ban all fan art of a character just because they want exclusive control over it, that would be unreasonable.
In my opinion, AI is just another way to make fan art for people who can't draw. It provides an opportunity for fans who might not have traditional artistic skills to express their love and creativity for a character. AI-generated fan art can democratize the creative process, allowing more people to participate and share their interpretations and ideas. Banning AI-generated fan art would limit these creative expressions and the sense of community that fan art fosters.
So, is it wrong to let people make art in their own way?
And let's be honest, that character is just coomer bait.
Think you can do tvma's rosana?
who?
@Bolivante https://e621.net/posts?tags=rosana_%28tvma%29
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.