Deepthroat lora for Chroma. It can do both pov and sideview.
Description
Trained on 60 images, the images are of high quality with good lightning,
FAQ
Comments (23)
Does Chroma need help with deepthroats?
Yeah from my experience it does
No it doesn't, ill post something I just made.
Sometimes having "penis tip" in the negative can help
@llhappyll822 huge, thanks dude
@SeaEng can you make a balls deep version? Chroma absolutely can't do it.
@TheNecr0mancer try "cock deep in her throat". with as much description as possible, Chroma is hands down the best model I have used.
@cgsthrasher726 that helped slightly with the tip always being visible (without lora) but definitely not to the base
@TheNecr0mancer Challenge accepted. What I posted below I did without any lora, I am sure I can make it deeper looking.
@TheNecr0mancer Posting more without lora, you can use my prompts, but like I said, be descriptive, use AI to help. https://toolbaz.com/writer/paragraph-generator
@TheNecr0mancer Im convinced Chroma was trained on alot of porn.
@TheNecr0mancer Ive also found, it knows ALOT of art styles "disney animation" "looney tunes" etc etc...
@TheNecr0mancer yeah I've been thinking about it, will see 😊
@cgsthrasher726 No mystery about it, the point was to train it on porn.
Great as a proof of concept, but it has almost non existent variety and weird blendings, would love a 2k+ images trained deepthroat model, it would absolutely rock.
Tell me you never trained a Lora without telling me you never trained a Lora 😅
I have never trained a lora, but I've been extensively trying this one, two things happen: the eyes are skewed in almost every photo where it doesn't happen without this lora and the exact same prompt, and the variety also drops significantly. I apologize if I was mistaken in how to improve it, but those are the main effects. edit: also it always tries to apply makeup to the girls.
@mark_sausage439 Generally the answer to this is to push the strength down. Most CHroma loras are over-baked. The model is highly influenced by most loras. Even position loras I tend to only use at 50%, most are at 0.3.
@mark_sausage439 you don't need this Chroma is incredibly detailed look my posts and use the prompts.
@cgsthrasher726 You've got your CFG cranked way tf up though, so your saturation is all out of whack. I suppose with some passes through upscaling/adetailer that could resolve it though.
This lora works but it has an issue. Without this lora, images generate quickly. With it active, it's like the entire model needs to reload between every image. And sometimes the image will just hang, progressing very slowly. Using a 3090 and v48-detail-calibrated.
Okey nothing I've noticed when using the lora, once loaded it is as fast as without loras. I'm using a 4090.
It might not be playing with the other Loras I was using with it. I can't remember what they were now but they all worked nicely together. I'll try it on it's own when I get a chance. Thanks for looking into it.