Flux Version Update
We are excited to announce the release of the latest Flux version of our AI model. This update brings significant improvements in the model's ability to seamlessly integrate with other models while maintaining its intended appearance and outfit.
Reduced Over-Fitting: The current Flux version substantially reduces the risk of over-fitting when combined with other models. This means the AI will maintain its core characteristics and avoid exaggerated or inconsistent behavior.
Improved Appearance Consistency: With this update, the AI model better preserves its expected appearance and outfit even when fused with other models. Users can anticipate a more stable and predictable look for the AI across different model combinations.
Enhanced Compatibility: The Flux version now offers smoother integration with a wider range of models. This expanded compatibility allows for more creative combinations without sacrificing the AI's intended design and functionality.
Through this Lora, you can showcase two different types of underwear for women at once.
old version
This is my bold attempt to perform two actions at once, but obviously, it did not achieve the desired effect and cannot effectively combine with other Lora uses. However, it is still possible to produce some images as a single checkpoint.
このLoraを通じて、女性が同時に2つのタイプのランジェリーを表示することができます。これは、2つのアクションを同時に作成するための私の大胆な試みでした。しかし、期待した効果を得ることができず、他のLoraと効果的に組み合わせることはできません。ただし、単一のチェックポイントを使用していくつかの画像を生成することは、まだ可能です。
很少色色難得色色一下
Description
It shows that the underwear is stable. I need to unzip the clothes and test them.
FAQ
Comments (11)
I question why, if, as you say "it did not achieve the desired effect and cannot effectively combine with other Lora uses" you're charging for this? (And if it's to help with processing costs, that I understand, it can get expensive.)
It's far too expensive though
I understand your question. Indeed, it may seem contradictory that I'm charging for this LORA while mentioning in its description that it didn't fully achieve the desired effect. Allow me to explain my thoughts:
Firstly, I want to emphasize that although this LORA might have some flaws, it's still the most popular one among my current LORA works based on the overall user ratings. Many people find it uniquely creative and consider the flaws to be within an acceptable range. This indicates that it does bring a certain value to the users.
Secondly, maintaining a LORA model requires continuous investment in hardware resources, which also incurs costs. To sustain the quality of the LORA and support subsequent development, a moderate charge can provide some financial support.
Thirdly, charging is also a market regulation mechanism. Through pricing, users who truly find the LORA valuable and are willing to pay can continue using it, while those who don't think it's worth the price can opt for other free alternatives. This helps optimize the user base of the LORA.
Lastly, regarding pricing, I will continuously monitor market feedback and adjust dynamically as needed. My goal is to strike a balance between the sustainable development of the LORA and the interests of the users.
Thank you again for raising this excellent question. If you have any other suggestions about pricing, please feel free to let me know. I will seriously consider your opinions.
@allpleoleo439 nice chatgpt
@allpleoleo439 I'm not okay with the price of LoRa—it's far too expensive for what it offers. On top of that, the fact that you admit the LoRa is faulty raises serious concerns about its reliability. To make matters worse, EA's goals are hidden, making it difficult to trust your intentions. When a product is costly, unreliable, and comes from a company that isn't transparent, it's hard to justify any investment in it.
@lost_moon Thank you for your feedback. We acknowledge that our first paid product still has many areas that need improvement. We appreciate your suggestions, and we will take them into consideration. In our future paid plans, we will aim to set prices that better align with market expectations and provide more detailed information for users to consider.
@lost_moon to be fair this "market" is really new, I consider all of this atm to be price discovery so i aint put off by @allpleoleo439 asking this price, but yeah, i sure as hell aint paying it.
I guess people dislike it just because they are scare of idea that Loras can be not free. But I think it is actually great for the community, because people will be able to make better Loras this way.
@Lera123 Restrictions. You will not, and will not permit, assist or cause any third party to
a. use, modify, copy, reproduce, create Derivatives of, or Distribute the FLUX.1 [dev] Model (or any Derivative thereof, or any data produced by the FLUX.1 [dev] Model), in whole or in part, for (i) any commercial or production purposes
ii) For clarity, use for revenue-generating activity or direct interactions with or impacts on end users, or use to train, fine tune or distill other models for commercial use is not a Non-Commercial purpose.
It makes all women look asian
Dm me On discord for the Model Download link. It's shared on many servers BUT it's really not worth it. Don't support early access.
Details
Files
Available On (2 platforms)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.