CivArchive
    Preview 120465098
    Preview 120464129
    Preview 120464131
    Preview 120464128
    Preview 120464130
    Preview 120464133
    Preview 120464127
    Preview 120464126
    Preview 120464132
    Preview 120464135

    Cinematic Photorealism Turbo Checkpoint

    Ultra-realistic generation optimized for speed, precision, and material fidelity.
    Delivers professional-grade photography results in as few as 9 steps. Fully compatible with FP8 quantization.


    📘 Overview

    This is a high-fidelity photorealism checkpoint built for creators who refuse to compromise between quality and generation speed. Fine-tuned on diverse real-world imagery, it excels at capturing natural skin textures, anatomically accurate human forms, complex material interactions, and cinematic lighting. Optimized for modern inference pipelines, it maintains stunning detail even at low step counts and minimal CFG.


    ✨ Key Features

    • 🧴 True-to-Life Skin & Imperfections: Visible pores, peach fuzz, natural freckles, and subsurface scattering. Zero "plastic" or airbrushed look.

    • 🤲 Reliable Anatomy & Dynamics: Stable hands, facial features, and complex poses (jumping, dancing, object interaction). No fused fingers or distorted joints.

    • 🧵 Material Mastery: Accurate rendering of silk, denim, leather, wet surfaces, metal, glass, and macro textures. Clear separation between contrasting materials.

    • 💡 Advanced Lighting & Color Grading: Handles golden hour, neon nights, volumetric light, and high-contrast scenes without banding, noise, or color shifts.

    • Turbo-Optimized Workflow: Performs exceptionally at 9–15 steps with CFG 1.0–1.5, drastically reducing VRAM usage and generation time.

    • 🔧 FP8 Ready: Official FP8 variant retains >95% visual fidelity. Ideal for lower VRAM setups, batch processing, or real-time workflows.


    Parameter

    Value

    Sampler

    DPM++ 2s a RF (or DPM++ 2M Karras)

    Steps

    9 (Turbo) / 20–30 (High Detail)

    CFG Scale

    1.0 (Turbo) / 5.0–7.0 (Standard)

    Scheduler

    KL Optimal

    Resolution

    1024x1536 (or native aspect ratio)

    VAE

    Built-in / vae-ft-mse-840000

    Clip Skip

    1

    Seed

    Fixed for consistency, or -1 for variation


    📝 Prompting Guide

    Style: Use photography-focused descriptors. The model responds best to clear, technical prompts rather than artistic/stylized keywords.

    ✅ Positive Prompt Examples:

    text

    1

    text

    1

    🚫 Negative Prompt:

    text

    1


    🔧 FP8 Quantization Notes

    • FP8 variant uses float8_e4m3fn per-tensor scaling.

    • Tested across macro, portrait, material, night-scene, and dynamic pose benchmarks with negligible quality loss.

    • Recommended for: VRAM-constrained GPUs, batch generation, turbo workflows.

    • Keep CFG ≤ 1.5 and Steps ≥ 9 for optimal FP8 stability.


    🧪 Validation & Testing

    Rigorously benchmarked across 10+ scenarios: ✅ Macro eye/portrait (skin, lashes, reflections)
    ✅ Hand-object interaction & anatomy
    ✅ Mechanical macro (gears, metal, glass)
    ✅ Interior reflections & wet surfaces
    ✅ Material contrast (denim, leather, wood)
    ✅ Night neon & dynamic range
    ✅ Fashion editorial & fabric dynamics
    ✅ Sports/action poses & muscle definition
    ✅ Dance & flowing fabric physics
    ✅ FP16 ↔ FP8 visual parity verification


    📜 Credits & License

    • Base Architecture: [e.g., SDXL / Z-Image Turbo / Custom]

    • Trained/Fine-tuned by: [Your Handle/Name]

    • License: [e.g., CreativeML Open RAIL-M / CC BY-NC 4.0 / Custom]

    • ⚠️ Disclaimer: This model is intended for creative, artistic, and research purposes. Users are responsible for complying with local laws and ethical guidelines. Generated content does not represent real individuals unless explicitly stated.


    💡 Tip: If you experience minor contrast shifts in FP8, switch to e5m2 dtype or increase steps to 12–15. For maximum realism, keep CFG at 1.0 and let the model’s native priors guide composition.

    Description

    cosmetic changes

    FAQ

    Comments (15)

    stargazer786Feb 9, 2026· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    I used another model since weeks and came here by chance. Your model seems to reproduce much better results, thanks for that. Please go on..-)

    FASCIUM
    Author
    Feb 9, 2026· 1 reaction

    thank you

    mik_kryaFeb 12, 2026· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Excellent test model.

    The only thing I noticed is that she often draws nipples over clothing. Keep up the good work!!! We're waiting for the full version, which will satisfy both you and us)))

    Thanks!

    Отличная тест модель.

    Единственное что заметил, это что соски часто поверх одежды рисует. Так держать!!! Ждём полную версию, которая устроит вас и нас)))

    Спасибо!

    SaoirseTeaganFeb 28, 2026
    CivitAI

    i hope you continue working on this, it is really lovely

    FASCIUM
    Author
    Feb 28, 2026· 1 reaction

    Of course, I won't abandon this model, but the thing is that I train LORA myself and then include them in the model. At the moment, it excludes most of my ideas. Only then will there be significant progress.

    smxyxjtan269Mar 2, 2026· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Is there a chance you’ll be working on Z Image Base?

    FASCIUM
    Author
    Mar 2, 2026· 1 reaction

    Maybe, work in process, but not now

    65WestMar 2, 2026· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Great model! Please continue with your creativity and provide more. :-)

    7234728Mar 3, 2026· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Good models!

    But renewed2 produces exactly the same images as Renewed, even though their checksums differ, which is a bit odd. Just FYI.

    FASCIUM
    Author
    Mar 3, 2026· 2 reactions

    They differ in specific areas, in styles and graphics, but not globally. I adhere to the position of small changes; for myself, I make such changes constantly.

    7234728Mar 3, 2026

    @FASCIUM Ok. I have no idea how that works. I haven't really used a style (photo realistic), but as far as I can tell from a handful of gens, by flipping between 2 images produced by renewed 1 and 2, there's no difference. But they're good, so thanks for sharing the models!

    FASCIUM
    Author
    Mar 3, 2026

    @wrOngplanet in realistic no difference

    7234728Mar 3, 2026

    @FASCIUM Aha ok, thanks for replying!

    zyxt99565Mar 16, 2026

    @FASCIUM What ARE the differences? Your example prompts produce near identical results to the base ZImageTurbo model. The differences are roughly equivalent to changing seed values. Your earlier versions were pixel-for-pixel identical. That's no longer true, but I'm still unable to find where the meaningful differences are. What have you changed? Are you training the model on a set of images?

    FASCIUM
    Author
    Mar 16, 2026

    @zyxt99565 added my trained LORAs. now i have trouble with merging software and take a break for models

    Checkpoint
    ZImageTurbo

    Details

    Downloads
    683
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    2/9/2026
    Updated
    8/5/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    fasciumzImageTurbo_renewed.safetensors

    Mirrors