Cinematic Photorealism Turbo Checkpoint
Ultra-realistic generation optimized for speed, precision, and material fidelity.
Delivers professional-grade photography results in as few as 9 steps. Fully compatible with FP8 quantization.
📘 Overview
This is a high-fidelity photorealism checkpoint built for creators who refuse to compromise between quality and generation speed. Fine-tuned on diverse real-world imagery, it excels at capturing natural skin textures, anatomically accurate human forms, complex material interactions, and cinematic lighting. Optimized for modern inference pipelines, it maintains stunning detail even at low step counts and minimal CFG.
✨ Key Features
🧴 True-to-Life Skin & Imperfections: Visible pores, peach fuzz, natural freckles, and subsurface scattering. Zero "plastic" or airbrushed look.
🤲 Reliable Anatomy & Dynamics: Stable hands, facial features, and complex poses (jumping, dancing, object interaction). No fused fingers or distorted joints.
🧵 Material Mastery: Accurate rendering of silk, denim, leather, wet surfaces, metal, glass, and macro textures. Clear separation between contrasting materials.
💡 Advanced Lighting & Color Grading: Handles golden hour, neon nights, volumetric light, and high-contrast scenes without banding, noise, or color shifts.
⚡ Turbo-Optimized Workflow: Performs exceptionally at
9–15 stepswithCFG 1.0–1.5, drastically reducing VRAM usage and generation time.🔧 FP8 Ready: Official FP8 variant retains >95% visual fidelity. Ideal for lower VRAM setups, batch processing, or real-time workflows.
⚙️ Recommended Settings
Parameter
Value
Sampler
DPM++ 2s a RF (or DPM++ 2M Karras)
Steps
9 (Turbo) / 20–30 (High Detail)
CFG Scale
1.0 (Turbo) / 5.0–7.0 (Standard)
Scheduler
KL Optimal
Resolution
1024x1536 (or native aspect ratio)
VAE
Built-in / vae-ft-mse-840000
Clip Skip
1
Seed
Fixed for consistency, or -1 for variation
📝 Prompting Guide
Style: Use photography-focused descriptors. The model responds best to clear, technical prompts rather than artistic/stylized keywords.
✅ Positive Prompt Examples:
text1
text1
🚫 Negative Prompt:
text1
🔧 FP8 Quantization Notes
FP8 variant uses
float8_e4m3fnper-tensor scaling.Tested across macro, portrait, material, night-scene, and dynamic pose benchmarks with negligible quality loss.
Recommended for: VRAM-constrained GPUs, batch generation, turbo workflows.
Keep
CFG ≤ 1.5andSteps ≥ 9for optimal FP8 stability.
🧪 Validation & Testing
Rigorously benchmarked across 10+ scenarios: ✅ Macro eye/portrait (skin, lashes, reflections)
✅ Hand-object interaction & anatomy
✅ Mechanical macro (gears, metal, glass)
✅ Interior reflections & wet surfaces
✅ Material contrast (denim, leather, wood)
✅ Night neon & dynamic range
✅ Fashion editorial & fabric dynamics
✅ Sports/action poses & muscle definition
✅ Dance & flowing fabric physics
✅ FP16 ↔ FP8 visual parity verification
📜 Credits & License
Base Architecture:
[e.g., SDXL / Z-Image Turbo / Custom]Trained/Fine-tuned by:
[Your Handle/Name]License:
[e.g., CreativeML Open RAIL-M / CC BY-NC 4.0 / Custom]⚠️ Disclaimer: This model is intended for creative, artistic, and research purposes. Users are responsible for complying with local laws and ethical guidelines. Generated content does not represent real individuals unless explicitly stated.
💡 Tip: If you experience minor contrast shifts in FP8, switch to e5m2 dtype or increase steps to 12–15. For maximum realism, keep CFG at 1.0 and let the model’s native priors guide composition.
Description
cosmetic changes
FAQ
Comments (15)
I used another model since weeks and came here by chance. Your model seems to reproduce much better results, thanks for that. Please go on..-)
thank you
Excellent test model.
The only thing I noticed is that she often draws nipples over clothing. Keep up the good work!!! We're waiting for the full version, which will satisfy both you and us)))
Thanks!
Отличная тест модель.
Единственное что заметил, это что соски часто поверх одежды рисует. Так держать!!! Ждём полную версию, которая устроит вас и нас)))
Спасибо!
i hope you continue working on this, it is really lovely
Of course, I won't abandon this model, but the thing is that I train LORA myself and then include them in the model. At the moment, it excludes most of my ideas. Only then will there be significant progress.
Is there a chance you’ll be working on Z Image Base?
Maybe, work in process, but not now
Great model! Please continue with your creativity and provide more. :-)
Good models!
But renewed2 produces exactly the same images as Renewed, even though their checksums differ, which is a bit odd. Just FYI.
They differ in specific areas, in styles and graphics, but not globally. I adhere to the position of small changes; for myself, I make such changes constantly.
@FASCIUM Ok. I have no idea how that works. I haven't really used a style (photo realistic), but as far as I can tell from a handful of gens, by flipping between 2 images produced by renewed 1 and 2, there's no difference. But they're good, so thanks for sharing the models!
@wrOngplanet in realistic no difference
@FASCIUM Aha ok, thanks for replying!
@FASCIUM What ARE the differences? Your example prompts produce near identical results to the base ZImageTurbo model. The differences are roughly equivalent to changing seed values. Your earlier versions were pixel-for-pixel identical. That's no longer true, but I'm still unable to find where the meaningful differences are. What have you changed? Are you training the model on a set of images?
@zyxt99565 added my trained LORAs. now i have trouble with merging software and take a break for models









