🌌 Aethermix
Aethermix delivers a unique blend of clean, gloomy, and anime-style aesthetics with a heavy focus on anatomical precision.
⚙️ Suggested Settings
For optimal results, please use these parameters:
Sampler:
Euler a(Euler Ancestral) 🧪Scheduler:
Karras📉CFG Scale:
4.0🎚️Steps:
30⏱️A1111 Flags:
--xformers --no-half-vae🛠️Clip Skip:
2🖇️
🔄 Version History
Version v4.0 Dreamland ✨ (Latest)
Strategic Mixing: Expertly blended with v1.0 and selected external models to maximize anatomical accuracy and structural stability.
Refined Details: Leverages the flexibility of the original version while eliminating past inconsistencies in body proportions and limb generation.
The Dreamy Peak: Achieves the most advanced version of the signature dreamy lighting effect through this multi-model integration.
Version 3.0 🌳 (Still Latest)
Dreamy Overlay: Mixed with v1.0 to re-introduce a signature ethereal glow.
Anatomy: Significant stability pass; provides the most consistent body structures yet.
Maturity: Increased character maturity levels for more realistic and refined features.
Comparison: A major leap in quality over v2.0.
Version 2.0 💠
Flexibility: Improved prompt adherence across wide and close-up shots.
Lighting Fixes: Balanced the harsh "gloomy fantasy" lighting from v1.0.
Refinement: Fixed mature female facial structures.
Version 1.0 🌱
The Original: High prompt flexibility but prone to anatomical inconsistencies.
Aesthetic: Characterized by high-contrast, harsh gloomy lighting.
🏷️ Quality Tags
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality (Note: Use these sparingly; the model is tuned to perform well without tag-spamming!)🤝 Credits & Links
Baking Status: BAKED 🥧
Top Contributors: Shotgun00700 | Sexiam 🎨
PulpFiction Website: 🌐 (Includes exclusive web tools)
Description
FAQ
Comments (4)
I feel like 2.0 is somewhat clearer with regards to linework, but it seems a step down in terms of what the model can understand. It's much more strongly biased, it seems, and needs to be carefully guided or it doesn't give as good results.
Ok! thanks for your review, I totally understand. I'll try to fix it in v3.0.
I really love your V1 of this model. It is dynamic, expressive, and I was able to get more artistic and incredible works than with most others.
Unfortunately I consider your V2 a dramatic downgrade. It seems better at linework, as stated. I didnt find the V1 to be bad on its linework or subject clarity at all.
Unfortunately, V2 is "boring" in comparison. I will happily bid to support keeping your V1 on for onsite generation in the future.
ok, I understand what you wanna say? I totally agree with that and I'll fix it in v3.0 & thanks for biding