[10:17<00:00, 617.55s/it]

@XT_404 are the light 4-8 step loras baked in? what CFG do you recommend?

@XT_404 its a shame not Q8 because that Quant have the best output quality so far but I respect that and thank you for your work! and It's okay to block those fake moralists and envious people who are good at criticizing but not at contributing quality stuff, many of them make very poor quality Loras and think they're a big deal.

@XT_404 Thank you very much for noticing my questions. I understand everything.

What do you mean, the page doesn't exist? Everything opens fine.

@noisedreamart it was error 404 when I posted.

@XT_404 how many steps and what samplers are better?

"Model" isn't a very descriptive name. What is it, specifically?

@XT_404 Predictable troll response. Using that troll reasoning, every model in safetensors format would be called model.safetensors. Obviously, as anyone can see, that isn't practical.

So, maybe consider answering the question instead of trying to be cute.

I'm guessing model.safetensor is his own clip vision model, its a comparable size to other clip visions used with wan2.2, but yes, clip vision is used in other workflows, it helps with consistency in i2v workflows. You can use the authors model.safetensor or clip_vision_h or clip_vision_l... it works with all of them.

@brendacaro We shouldn't have to guess.

@XT_404 Is there another link to this file?

@XT_404 just tried that to no avail, even did a complete update of all nodes. poop :(

@XT_404 typical :( well this seems to be my only issue with my comfyui at the moment, so i'll figure out how to use the models in a slightly different manner, thanks though as always

C:\Comfyui\custom_nodes>git clone https://github.com/XT-404/XT-404_SKYNET.git

Cloning into 'XT-404_SKYNET'...

remote: Enumerating objects: 239, done.

remote: Counting objects: 100% (85/85), done.

remote: Compressing objects: 100% (85/85), done.

remote: Total 239 (delta 44), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 154 (from 1)

Receiving objects: 100% (239/239), 1.58 MiB | 3.71 MiB/s, done.

Resolving deltas: 100% (125/125), done.

C:\Comfyui\custom_nodes>



redo comyfui


This workflow has missing nodes

This workflow uses custom nodes you haven't installed yet.

WanVideoDualInterpolator

Install these nodes to run this workflow, or replace them with installed alternatives. Missing nodes are highlighted in red on the canvas

bleh

@XT_404 @XT_404 @XT_404 ah my bad i tried to use one of your videos as the workflow as im always interested i the prompt, i used WORKFLOW X-T Dual Phase from the website and all is good :D if ur bothered it was this 1

https://image.civitai.com/xG1nkqKTMzGDvpLrqFT7WA/644b9024-826c-4b18-9a4b-a32efc21ec21/transcode=true,width=450,optimized=true/wan22_rife_00159.webm

All I know is that he pointed people to a file called model.safetensors. When I asked him what model that is, he said "it's a model, nothing more, nothing less." How precious.

@ss9999 I really don't understand this guy's goal. Why lie? Why belittle others' work while stealing from them? His old models were nothing but merges of other models, and now he dares to talk down to others.

Stop criticizing him. I've already said this to other users. Whether it's a merge or not, he worked hard to create this template. The main thing is to have a template that works. I encourage you to merge as much as possible. We're here to share, and for free. I think the detractors should shut up. I see that he's not sharing with the community—there's nothing in their accounts, no images or videos, so they're the ones profiting from it and then reselling our content on other sites. Shame on you!!!

Me personally I am so very OK with his models that you "who criticizing him" call them "merges",

@lighthorsexajz830 My comment is not a critique, I am just setting the record straight. On the other hand, this guy doesn't just criticize other people's work, he calls them incompetent while stealing from them and making merges. Do you think that's normal? Please read the description. He claimed he paid thousands of euros to make his model, yet many people checked and found they were just merges. And now this guy is insulting others... Seriously, are you defending that?

I don't have a problem with his model being a merge either, everyone does that. The problem is that this person takes us for fools and, on top of that, insults the work of others that he is stealing. There are rules on Civitai, and what he is doing goes against those rules. He doesn't know it yet, but even without metadata, we can find out how the model was made using tensors and SHA256.

@heyad ai is full of grifters and scammers. the fact theres zero info about this wan "trained" model but a long rant about "haters" tells me more than enough already.

@heyad just stfu man lmao

@XT_404 No problem, I say what I think. I don't like ungrateful people. Thank you for your effort. I love your models ;)

Honestly those attacking you XT_404, they look so much like shaming & bullying, I remember what they did with your past version (Insidious) , & here after so short time of you posted this new Exitium version, the criticism is back again like being attaracted with a magnet !

@XT_404 I am not yet sure what do they want, do they want you to stop ? you don't unless you really want to, not because they want it, do they try to prevent others from having your model? no, you are sharing it for free like many other creators here, you offer a functioning model (few days ago someone shared a version of "Nunchaku Qwen Edit" & just costed me bucket data & time downloading it, to discover it is only working for RTX5xxx series which I don't have & just because he didn't cost himself few lines of writing this in the model's name or description & he doesn't easily reply comments to answer question) you don't do all of that, your models work & you reply people trying to ask you about whatever, no shame at all, good on you :) . I still say it, you & DaSiWa provided us very nice custom WAN models until now, you are not the only great ones for sure, but you gave me free gifts, thanks ;)

@XT_404 I'm enjoying using your Omega Uncensored libidinous V2, INSIDIOUS LIBIDINOUS DRAFT V4, and your new EXITIUM VICTRIX models. They truly impress with their wide range of capabilities. The results often exceed all expectations. Each model is unique in its own way. Now about the attacks. I read the caustic comments from all these "people" even before you deleted your model thread. They say truth is born in debate. Yes, that's true. But only with intelligent and reasonable people, not with those filled with envy, hatred, and shallowness. And here it would be appropriate to discuss jointly improving the models, rather than hurling vitriol at someone who has managed to create something good. Therefore, I support you and urge you not to be distracted by ignorance, rudeness, and envy. Continue to inspire people to be creative; you are doing an excellent job of it.

@marsele117268 I completely agree with you, that would be ideal, but I don't think it's a good idea with this guy. To understand why, you have to know what happened with his latest models someone simply told him to stop telling everyone he had spent thousands of dollars on finetuning when he was just taking models and merging them (personally, I call that very easy work) but that's not the point, it's more about the ethics. And that guy, xt_404, did nothing but hurl insults to defend himself. To work together, you have to start by being honest and, above all, respectful, and he is proving once again that he isn't you just have to look at his description.

So these are your arguments? I haven't shared anything here myself, so I guess I don't have the right to speak? I share a lot on GitHub and Hugging Face, so should I ask people who comment if they share resources, and if not, they should keep quiet? Ridiculous... What you call "hard work" is just merging other models together when some creators don't even allow it? I call that easy work and theft, but to know that, you would need to be aware of certain things or do some research beforehand unfortunately, that isn't the case for you. One last thing, tell me how you operate it bothers you when we criticize this person's actions? Then why doesn't it bother you when he does the same, or even worse, in his description?

@XT_404 Watch out sir, we are a sect plotting against you in the shadows our machiavellian plan is to harm you... Is that the best you could come up with to get out of this? It's called accusatory inversion. And your stories about metadata corruption is that really the only excuse you found to keep mocking people? You claim to do custom model, yet the metadata corruption shows "automerger" nodes, The name of the "automerger" node is also a bug, I guess? It is still quite surprising that your bug follows the exact same process everyone uses to merge models what a coincidence, isn't it? loras and checkpoints, featuring their exact names as if by magic, and then you complain about people criticizing you? Are you joking? Keep making a fool of yourself, it doesn't bother me.

If it doesn't bother you that this person steals the work of others while disparaging them and lying to the community, fine but don't come lecturing those who dislike these actions when you say nothing about him insulting people in his description. This is called intellectual dishonesty.

@fondaIA You talk sooooo much ! The way you are talking & reacting to XT 404 looks so much to me like trolling & bullying & honestly I saw you some users started attacking XT-404 in a rude way, with my own eyes even someother user here in civitai just shared a workflow for one of XT-404's model & another user just commented attacking him like (he is just grabing a random github thing & sharing it here in civitai),, you really act very suspicious & what you are doing will not stop us from using his work just like many other creators here sharing their work with us,

if you have issue with that? can you go & complain to civitai Admin team about their own policy & their website open to all of us ? instead of you attacking Augusts's posts like trolling it ?

@XT_404 A monologue is actually someone talking to themselves here, I have only been replying to you and to other comments open a dictionary and you'll see. You say you want to end the discussion, yet you keep talking; I don't understand?

@hazzoom82659 I won't ask you how I'm trolling, as that would be too hard for you to answer. However, I can personally give you an example of a troll, someone, for instance, who takes other people's work while insulting them, or tells us that metadata is a bug in a model that generates videos in 4 steps, Unlike the creator here, I trust people's intelligence, and that is why I am here. Think about it carefully this person claims not to merge, yet their model generates videos in 4 steps. If you enjoy being mocked, I repeat, that's fine, but don't blame others for not liking it. Finally, tell me so I should complain to Civitai? Thanks for the advice, but I know what to do. And if I may, before giving advice, apply it to yourself, that would be smarter. Instead of complaining about my non-existent trolling, go complain to Civitai instead.

@XT_404 You call those paragraphs (open a dictionary)? Seriously? I just sent a reply to certain comments and here I've done nothing but reply to your comment again.

@fondaIA Really ! LOL, just as I said, you talk sooooo much, maybe you are enjoying wasting our time too ?!

@XT_404 Got really good results after a little bit of prompting. No loras needed.👍

@XT_404 Thanks for the info! Why doesn't it just look in the same places as ComfyUI, though? All of the other model loaders see all of my models as defined in the 'extra_model_paths.yaml' file. I think a model loader should look in the global directories, but please enlighten me if I'm mistaken! Also, this all seems to work quite well so far, but the coloring can get weird. Also, I keep getting OOM on first run, but then it seems to go through on second try; I even switched FP32 to FP16 on the image to video node. Thanks for your contribution!

@XT_404 Okay! Thanks so much!

Thank you, I think this comment will help other users as well.

SKYNET.experimental, which NODE allows you to control the output video resolution?

I want to get a video in 368x480 resolution, but I don't know where to set these values in the workflow.

@XT_404 yes pls

Agreed.. works great with SVI, doesn't need lightning loras, and even at 4 steps and sigmasplits at 2, the results are great, and faces stay consistent. Really good job!

hmm ok. i am using an 8step lora, maybe that's the issue. it mostly happens when there is a lot of pale skin in the f0 image, then the video gets overexposed from ca. sec 2 on. (btw i do not if u merge or what :D, you are doing great!).

I have the same issue as described above, and I'm using the default settings from the workflows in the official Github, and no loras. I've tried to change some settings, but I have no idea yet what to try, as I'm quite new to all of this. Do you have any suggestions, if you fixed your problem? (great model, btw! I'm having a lot of fun experimenting with it)

@XT_404 Do you mean that I should try to disable some of these: Wan Spectre Chroma, OLED Dynamix, and Organic Skin ?

oui c'est génial et je te rejoins sur la qualité du travail et du développement d'AugusWrapth. Souvent des pépites passent inaperçues pour certain, d'autres n'en croient pas leurs yeux et leur chronomètre. ;-)

Agreed, I use it daily with SVI and I haven't felt a need to replace this model for any other so far.

@XT_404 thank you for quick reply

Just use a black/white/gray/noise texture instead of an actual ref image, and the model will "hallucinate" the whole action, actors included if you don't want ref images to "muddy the waters". Now if you want T2V for performance reasons, then it's different.
Have a good day!

@rmnot Thanks. I discovered this but the results are well, meh, with t2v. Absolutely love this model for I2v. Maybe the best one out there. But using it in this way for t2v just didn't give me the results I wanted. Could be I'm doing something wrong. 🤷

@XT_404 continuing videos - sorry using wanGP

This is my main model is and it's kinda very touch-and-go with the prompts... best practice i've figured out, is making sure the prompt for the second video continues the action at the end of the first video, and so on.

Does your test use a simple natural language prompt or a complex prompt?

I have the perfect workflow settings and prompt for a vs, Remix vs Dasiwa, Remix has better complex movements adherence results so far.

I will try this.

@XT_404 Ah thats why 😞 then it is not compatible with Mac it requires full fp16 base

@TieFighterPilot Maybe try the City96 gguf converter and make a quantized version.

@XT_404 I can`t download low too.High is ok