v3:
Steps: from 12 - more is better
For quality you can use dpm++ 2s ancestral. Something else if you want better speed. Default euler ancestral should work well.
Description
A version after 7 detailed upgrade merges.
FAQ
Comments (5)
If you have some major problems with this model - write about it here. I would try to fix things. I need to detect weakest sides to patch them first.
Hi! I tried using it a bit, but unlike your other models, which produce amazing results, I unfortunately can't say the same about this one. I've changed the settings, tweaked the steps, CFG, and tried a lot of other things, but all I get is a low-quality mess... Although I suspect the problem may be my inability to use this model properly. It reminded me of some noob models I've tried before, where, no matter what I did, the results were mediocre at best, if not terrible. I suspect it requires a different way of entering tags and hints, not the one I'm used to. That seems to be the case with your model, although I can't say for sure, as this is just my guess. Overall, I'll continue using your other model, the BTMX
@EroHeroArt hmm... Not sure how you have bad results all the time. This model have no specific style, so results may be looking amateurish or really good with the same prompt if you would not specify.
"I suspect it requires a different way of entering tags and hints" - this model prefer natural language more. For example "three girls" would work better than "3girls" (Illustrious 2.0 thing...).
Can you give me examples of your positive/negative prompts? I will try to make sure they would look better in future versions. I need some precise info to understand where is main issue. I want to make it usable for majority, but still with its uniqueness.
@Shio_N So, you've confirmed my suspicions... - "For example, 'three girls' would work better than '3 girls' (Illustrious 2.0 thing...)."
I don't know English well, and I use translators when I need to. So, for me, interacting with the AI using Danbooru tags is much clearer, more convenient, and simpler. Apparently, this model is simply not for me
@Shio_N I posted an example there, it will probably soon appear in the list of images below the model.