I'm a bit confused how to use the sulfur_rank768 lora, can you explain? If I use it in place of the distill lora, it generates garbage. If I add it in addition to distill lora, also generates garbage.

@Mohzaic use both and set the sulphur lora to 0.50 for both high and low passes. I use the ceil72 lora and 10 steps. ceil72 set to .7 on low pass and .6 on high pass

@delta45424155 What do you mean high and low pass? This is for LTX. Do you mean for the upscale?

@Mohzaic You need to leave the distill lora as you usually do, or use distill ltx model, I meant use sulphur lora instead of the sulphur base checkpoint.

@ajreyz1384 you can run the sulphur lora from .9 to 1.0 for 1st pass and upscale, thats what i did, better results for image to video. or experiment!

Clone comfy and learn it once, or spend your entire gooner career looking for ways to get X to work on Y.

@85ck014xun768 nah.. i prefere a gradio webui than that noodles nonsense

just rename it to whatever your current LTX model is named in wan2gp and it will load it

@85ck014xun768 Got ComfyUI, got even multiple self-modified txt2img and img2img workflows which are now my main image generation platforms after 2 years spent entirely in Fooocus. But unlike ComfyUI, Wan2GP at least can launch this thing on my prehistoric RTX 3080 Ti and generate 10 seconds long 720p footage in ~3 minutes using distilled model. My attempts to generate something in ComfyUI few months ago failed entirely.

you can load it into kolboldccp but you'll still want to provide it a good system prompt.

@delta45424155 Yeah, I am already using a vision enabled qwen3-based model via Ollama (for I2V prompt enhancement), I was hoping these models would in some way be more optimised/efficient for LTX with baked in system prompts (or similar).

I'd say Eros is better at nsfw t2v

You can use Sulphur for i2v just fine. I just uploaded 1 exemple.

From what I've seen theres motion differences between really long prompts and seeds I2V but I haven't seen direct T2V side by side tests yet. The real sulphur version is the legit model and fusioncow is the one who literally trained itl. You would get the most flexibility by running the actual data lora.

In my muggle eyes, not much differences between Eros and Sulphur in both T2V and I2V. But they say Sulphur's more complete.

welcome to the LTX community, no one knows anything, people create stuff, put it out, no actual instruction or working workflows. Everyone assumes everyone else is a programmer or something

I use CheckpointLoaderKJ and VAE goes into Video Vae. Audio I use regular ltx2.3 but I think the original WF for sulphur used it also for Audio, but since I dont care too much about audio I dont mind. edit: In my workflow if I use it for audio I get an error : "
AttributeError: 'VAE' object has no attribute 'latent_frequency_bins'"

Mines on 0.6 and works fine.

@RadomAccessFor It's recommended to run it at 0.9-1.0 in the first pass, and 0.5-0-6 in the second pass.

@K0DEX i try 384 with 0.3 + condasafe with 0.5 (no audio) work well Reduced the feeling of ghosting and avoided the audio damage caused by the conda :)

@djjayem940696 tks

This is the distilled lora for the sulphur dev checkpoint. You can use the Sulphur lora rank 768 combined with any distilled checkpoint too (0.8-0.9).

it is censored as heck due to not being abliterated, use another model. https://huggingface.co/GitMylo/nsfwvision-v5_qwen3.5-9b-sft