Only reason I see them for adding it. Funny too because unless I got contacted by them with assurances I'll never allow generation for anything I upload since they have a habit of randomly banning things for loose nudify violations. Meanwhile they leave all the Flux Klein straight nudify tools uploaded and readily available.

@tenstrip Don't give them any ideas. Last time I saw someone mention this it only led to the removal of the authors Lora AND a competing one, which meant they both lost. And the rest of us too. They're tools and should be treated as such.

If Justin was serious about opening the door slightly to a more spicy CivitAI now that Red is here, this is their chance.

Sulphur 2 Distilled is up for use, I just made a couple of vids. Came out better than the base for sure. And absolutely better than LTX 2.3 . I will have to grab the ggufs for safekeeping.

@FusionCow Pardon me, but I don't understand - Why is this even here, under "CivitaiOfficial"? You've posted the full checkpoint to your civ profile, and all the variants to hf 4 days ago. With actual quality generation samples, not some random nonsense a throwaway would attach to a model they'd plagiarised.

From your comment, I presume you were not contacted beforehand to ask your permission. Is civ now intent on taking not only credit for community published checkpoints, but the associated revenue from generation usage (lest we forget, 25% creator tip most of which goes to the base + direct tipping)?
The video model creator community which, if anyone needs a reminder, it has not fought to keep around and even actively taken action against in the past?

And why is dev set to generation only? I can perhaps understand wanting to save some bandwidth on a heavy model; However, a layman might be led to believe this variant is one of the cloud service only models (flux pro type deal) when nothing could be farther from the truth.

I am merely an observer, I do not wish to put words in your mouth, but I would appreciate your take on this matter, and @tenstrip's as well.

@firemanbrakeneck Last time I enabled anything for generation it got removed in a day so I won't unless they directly give me protection from vibe mods. I already have a bunch of hallway monitors following me who spam report all my realistic style I2V videos trying to farm protection ranks.

@tenstrip Thank you, this is exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about.

If civ genuinely wishes to reestablish rapport with the creators who built it up and sustain it, it needs to make a show of good faith. This looks to me more like a cash grab than respect.

@CivitaiOfficial @CivitaiOfficial @CivitaiOfficialTeam <- Do better, be better!

I am kinda a newbie with LTX Generation. Using it with Comfy, what folders do I put your models in?

@pjwhoopie checkpoint

@firemanbrakeneck I literally don't know I wasn't made aware of this

Yeah, Sulphur is cool but that is kind of embarrassing for the creator. Kind of basic, too.

https://huggingface.co/vantagewithai/Sulphur-2-Base-GGUF/tree/main

@FantasticFever Thank you!

@alexds9 I didn't try it, been using fp8, recommend this lora for distill https://huggingface.co/Seregil13th/Sulphur-2-base/tree/main/distill_loras

@FantasticFever Thank you :)

It's undertrained right now really, a bit early to pull the shot and offer on-site generation but nobody contacted about this. Needs a ton of lora stacks currently for T2V. Right now dataset is being pruned down for high quality reinforcement runs.

Something is wrong with your workflow. I generated a dozen videos with this text to video model yesterday and everything turned out the way I wanted. True, there is a minus - in all the videos, if you can see women's breasts, you can 'see' nipples through the clothes. Not the nipples themselves, but not quite natural-looking mounds. And the movements, the environment, the camera movement - no problems.

UPD. I just generated text to video in old side workflow - it works. Could you tell me what specifically isn't working for you? What query are you giving? Well, I didn't generate anything strictly "nsfw", maybe that's why everything works?

A Reddit discussion said this model can't handle men well and that every scene has to have a female present. That sounds like BigLove for SDXL where I would have to put like 30 negative terms in to avoid man-man scenes transforming the men into women. However, I see two examples of man-man here (albeit with one of them feminizing the middle guy, especially the butt) so perhaps that comment was about version 1.

@ss9999 It's just undertrained and mostly generalized and not able to fully target very specific prompts like that, but if you do i2v that shouldn't happen with the right detailed prompt and image. Seems like a weak prompt and bad WF to cause that. There's way more gay and male-male interactions than lesbian scenes in the dataset.