BeenYou - R13 is up!
For petite lovers
Improving NSFW or LoRA compatibility is not a goal
I'm testing the following versions on BeenYou Lite
⬇Please read the information below🙏
1️⃣Recommended Settings
- VAE is included
- Clip skip: 2
- CFG scale: 8- Sampler: DPM++ SDE Karras
Sampling Steps : 30+- Upscaler (Hires. fix): R-ESRGAN 4x+ Anime6B
Hires steps: 14
Denoising strength: 0.35
Upscale by: 1.5+- Default prompts
Pos: (best quality, masterpiece), ...
Neg: (worst quality, low quality), ...2️⃣Using Adetailer
- Main UI > Extensions > Install from URL
This fixes problems with the character's eyes and face in most situations
The default usage is to simply enable it and leave it alone✅Now you're good to go!
For more information, please continue below
ℹ️Why is my image different from yours?
I can't give you any technical help, sorry
Keep your prompts simple and correct
Tag auto complete extension to find the appropriate tags
Tags like 'Realistic, 8k, ...' sometimes ruin an image
Also These tags are often more useless than you might think
Neg Tags like 'mutated arms' are useless than you might think
Neg embedding can have a significant impact on the characteristics of a model
These are not as perfect as you might think
💝Contact & Support
⚠️Warning
You are solely responsible for any legal liability resulting from unethical use of this model
Don't use my model as bait to drive people to your paid generation service without permission
For anything other than general personal use, please be sure to contact me
Description
FAQ
Comments (80)
R11 has largely resolved the nagging issues of previous versions
Although eye expression is still an occasional problem 😭
But how about the beenyoulite?😭
@nbbxs22809 just uploaded an update
I am also having problems with hands. And make the model look at anything else than the camera.
What's the difference between the R11 and the Lite11 versions ?
I think lite gave the model more "curves"
still possible to get the beenyou_a2_a ? (the alpha)
Alpha 2 is here, as you can see
If it's not here, I can't get it either
@Bradcatt it seems that A2 is not exactly the same as the model you used in your preview pictures. The model filename has a difference, the one available is "beenyou_a2" while the one you used for the previews is "beenyou_a2_a". Great work btw, nice to see a model with normal proportions which is not anime style.
@absente1234 probably just VAE baked version
There shouldn't be much difference in the output
@Bradcatt do you by any chance still have it? Or at least the name of the VAE used?
generate some images that fbi will break my door...
Add some keywords to the Neg to avoid running into the FBI :D
@Bradcatt i use ((naked, nude, nipple )) and yet...
Try "clothed" in you positive prompt. or "not naked".
Can't promise it helps. But I have not had any problems like that myself. (yet)
i'll go with things that won't happen for $500 alex.
Keep getting better!
Hands and fingers, poor results
Yes, That seems to be a big weakness with this one.
I also have problems to make the model to look at something else than the viewer / camera.
And it is not happy with use of lora.
But it do make some beautiful images!!!
The hand expression was definitely up to my standards, which is odd.
but I'm a little busy right now, so I'll work on that later
Interesting, for me it made excellent hands and fingers right from the start. Try using the After Detailer, it might help.
Use only the default prompts suggested in the description
Excessive negative keywords and the like will only backfire
Can only agree. And it seems it is locked at "looking at viewer". Tried to make a pic with girl looking at her dog. but have failed so far.
Also I have a lot of problems with strange hands.
Besides that, it can make some really beautiful images.
"Hands behind back" or something like that solves the hands problem ;)
I'm using a lot your checkpoint, the face is always beatifull whit a irresistible smile!
Would you consider to release a "inpaint" version?
(for more info, search: ' how_to_turn_any_model_into_an_inpainting_model ' on reddit)
Thanks for the kind words, but I'm not considering the inpaint version right now due to low demand.
I'll think about it for the next update😉
I'm having this error:
TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable
Time taken: 5.98s
Torch active/reserved: 1825/3256 MiB, Sys VRAM: 5480/8192 MiB (66.89%)
I'm having some issues with your models (wrote on this because this one seems the most problematic). I was drawn to your models because the prompts were simple and the result seemed great. I've copied the gen. data but I'm not getting the same result. Most notably with messed up faces. Any ideas?
Are you using the hires fix? Recently I was having strange corrupped faces at x1.5, upped to x2 and problem solved. Upped to x3 and all faces are masterpieces. SD works bad with low resolution...
@settima_ai are you able to up easily to 3X ? i have a 16gb vram GPU and it runs out of memory if i do anything higher than 1920x1080 (that is 2.5x) so I did set that as a limit for hires fix. It obv. can be upscaled with controlnet easily with the block technique but that's another story, what settings do you use and which upscaler to get to 3X ?
@zx96 It's just because i'm using google colab (i dont have any kind of GPU!) so i'm using their online gpu. I can also access to superior GPU with 50 Gb, if necessary. Powerfull but uncomfortable (slow to setup and prone to internet disconnection)
@settima_ai I've used it, but I'll try to play around with the x to see if I get it. thanks for the reply.
My favorite model, I hope new versions come out.^^
can you make the mouth a bit more, uhh smaller? sometimes the mouth got too big and creepy
Just like my second image 🥲
BY relies heavily on old and poorly trained data, so it's always going to be a bit unstable
A completely new version will take some time.
@Bradcatt yes, thank you! really appreciate your works!
creepy? the preview images are pretty good
@RileyX preview is good for sure, but if you try to messing with the face a bit by using specific prompt, the mouth can be unproportionally large for the face
@Nakoni okay I dont mind that, but after testing I felt like that model has too much glow and lack of details.
Hi!
Beautiful model and I really like using it. Out of all your models, this is probably my favorite. Though, I need to ask.
I'm writing a family drama story with some lemon elements, and I was wondering if you could add a bit more NSFW to this model, or create a new checkpoint with the same style but more for NSFW purposes. The artstyle is absolutely my favorite and no other model provides such quality as this. Sadly it doesn't like LORAs so that's quite limiting.
It's kind of funny for me to say this, but I'm not interested in hard NSFW at the moment. I'm working on the next version, but BY is always focused on the body shape itself.
I have a few NSFW LoRAs for BY only that I plan to improve, integrate, and upload though.
@Bradcatt It's your model and you know what you want with it, so I'm fine totally with your decision. Though, if you ever change your mind, I will be the happiest person on the planet. Creating NSFW images (not necessarily orangemix level of NSFW) with perfectly proportional beautiful women and such lovely style would be a dream. I would try merge your model with something but I would probably just mess everything up, I have no experiece at all at merging models.
I am looking forward to your NSFW LoRAs and the next version of BY.
can you please reupload been real? it went off.
Maybe better avoid some trigger words
That's not my model.
@Bradcatt got it. sorry
Uploaded an unfinished version of R12
My SSD crashed and I lost data, so I'm recovering for now
uploaded file is rv15, and the example images are mostly rv14, which is not reproducible.
It's a bit unstable, but it works.
I guess it was a mistake to put all my data on an external SSD 🥲
I solved this problem years ago by having TWO exernal disk and copying always data on both. Of course, it may costs some $ more but it pays back a lot...
wow... thats really rare to hear an SSD dying like that. You tryied dismount the enclosure and mount it internally?
@p_p To be precise, it's an NVME, but I used a cheap enclosure and ended up with data contamination.
I could upload the models I have saved on hugging if you desire :)
WOW R12 seems promising! I like this path! By the way I have also tested BeenReal (a merge of BeenYou and a more realistic 2.5D model) and it is fantastic for both super cute faces and slick bodies, you could try to reintegrate it lol!!!
Hi @L0L1 , Civitai banned to STYM, the BeenReal checkpoint creator. Can you upload the checkpoint in MEGA or Drive and share link please? Can you write me in Twitter? (@brekuji)
Yeah interested in that too!
Yeah, as soon as I receive the notification of new update it was removed from civitai
What was the problem that made it disappear?
Hi, can you or smb send it to me? @pipiskalka (telegram / twitter)
need too!
the user STYM uploaded tons of models I think, he could have got reported for some reason. Honestly, civitai happens to ban people without notice for no apparent reason. I guess their banning system is completely arbitrary.
@Brekuji @meproimmocroye6500929 @Cala_Cunca @Hrenovina BeenReal is one of my favorite models recently, it has great faces most of the time without the "same face" syndrome.
Here it is : https://xgf.nu/XCFhR
@L0L1 Thank you very much! I'm gonna test it!
By the way, if I remember well, BeenReal was a merge of BeenYou and midreal25DAnime (which has been deleted as well it seems... but I can provide it if you want)
Well, so here is midreal25DAnime_V2.1 for those who want to try all kinds of merges!
If someone has a hugging face repository and uploads them there tell me!!!
https://xgf.nu/UdEBw
@L0L1 I merged beenyou (lite too) with revanimated and it's realy good too.
@L0L1 THANKS!
hello everyone I have asked in the Discord official channel about STYM and they told me he was banned as he violated the TOS of the site, but when I asked for further information, I didn't get any answers. I see that the author of BeenYou was ok with merges so it wasn't that problem. If you decide to create a repository of his models, I have a few archived. The best would be to get in touch with him, but where is he?
@zx96 mind sharing the repo please?
@Nakoni there is no repository, i have models on my own hard drive, i was referring that i could help if there is going to be a place to archive all STYM models, nothing is online except what linked in this thread.
@L0L1 I don't think that link works anymore :(
@zx96 if you do end up hosting them somewhere please share here https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/11pppvw/keeping_track_of_nuked_loraembeddingmodels_from/
I'm sticking with R11 for now...The new art style is not for me..
Face is close to the default and completely unfinished, but the colors are going to stay this way.
R12 looks promising!
I'm not sure yet if I like the new contrasty look, but I will fiddle with it today and see what I can create. I wonder if this revision will be able to handle LoRAs better, considering this is the completely rebuilt BY.
Looking forward to the finished rev!
And make sure to not store everything on your external SSD next time, ehe.
This is not an entirely new BY
It's the last version that uses the existing dataset
That's what happened, intentionally or unintentionally 🤣
Oh, so I'm guessing the one after this will be the new BY. You did mention on kofi that it will be rebuilt. I'm also guessing that it will take a looooong time. 😞
Referring to R12-unfinish : not the right way!
(I dont have 'adetailer' because never managed to install it, for unknow reasons)
I'm doing some comparative experiments swiching R11 with R12u, same parameters and seed. Both seem to do well with very simple prompts. The problem is when you add more. While R11 remains extremely good, the R12 version produce always bad results whith bodies and faces caricatural, like if subject had a bad plastic surgery! Looking at your demo images i try to guess: you wanted a nose even more raised and more red blush. But this was overcooked and ends in the problems I said. Also while R11 accepts famous people to change faces, R12u will literaly overact producing atrocious results... I could post some comparison but this fact is obvious after few time: R12u produces always worst result, sometime much worst...
I think we need to keep in mind that R12 is still unfinished. The author stated that it's unstable, but works. I would think by the time the stable version comes out, things will get better. But I'm not experienced with these stuff so perhaps I'm wrong.
I agree. I like R11 more because it's subtle and not too saturated.
is it forbidden to merge your model with others? because a user has been banned and he published a model merged with this one, just asking to understand what is the policy, thanks!
There are several other models with BY as a material and they are still available for download. I am not against merging models and the user being banned had nothing to do with me.
@Bradcatt @zx96: are you referring to "BeenReal" model, may be?
@settima_ai yes, cause I wanted to understand what happened there. the user had some great models that did not seem to have anything wrong within, but I was away a few days and I'm back and he's banned, wanted to understand why and if his creations are somewhere else, where. I was assuming there was a problem cause he used this famous model in his merge.
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.