Moss-image
Trained on Moss-image base, works with SFT and 8/4 step Turbo LoRAs. Rank 16, 750 steps. Capable of generating larger and/or hirsute men. Generation details: Euler/Simple or ER SDE/Bong Tangent for microdetails, 4-step LoRA, 6 steps, 8-step LoRA, 10 steps, CFG 1 or 1.5 for particularly complex compositions.
Krea 2
Helps with body-types that stray away from the mainstream archetype of muscular, young, toned, athletic and commercial. Capable of creating portly men with modest endowments. No "Internet" inches here.
Recommended resources: Kroma, abliterated Qwen 3 VL, Wan Vae fp32. Settings: steps 8, sampler scheduler: sa-solver/simple (or EXPheun2x0/SGM Uniform if you don't mind the extra generation time). Feel free to experiment with er_sde/bong tangent for human subjects, it gives great microdetail but bong tangent sometimes messes with anatomy. It works great however for a 2nd i2i pass with denoise at 0.25-0.45 depending on how much microdetail you want to add. Also great for i2i refinement is the combo euler-a or sa-solver/bong tangent, sometimes even better than er_sde.
Description
Helps with body-types that stray away from the mainstream archetype of muscular, young, toned, athletic and commercial. Capable of creating portly men with modest endowments. No "Internet" inches here.
Recommended resources: Fascium Krea 2 V1-2, abliterated Qwen 3 VL, Wan Vae fp32. Settings: steps 8, sampler scheduler: sa-solver/simple (or EXPheun2x0/SGM Uniform if you don't mind the extra generation time). Feel free to experiment with er_sde/bong tangent for human subjects, it gives great microdetail but bong tangent sometimes messes with anatomy. It works great however for a 2nd i2i pass with denoise at 0.25-0.45 depending on how much microdetail you want to add. Also great for i2i refinement is the combo sa-solver/bong tangent, sometimes even better than er_sde.
FAQ
Comments (4)
You really have a special fondness for overweight people, don't you...
Is it that obvious? Lol
amazing，What is the difference between these two Loras
Thank you. One focuses on the whole appearance, soft tissue distribution and musculature (or lack of thereof), the other specifically on the genital area.