CivArchive
    Krea2 - Jack-o Pose lora - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 140711507
    Preview 140711508
    Preview 140711510
    Preview 140711512
    Preview 140711515
    Preview 140711517
    Preview 140711519
    Preview 140711520
    Preview 140711524
    Preview 140711530
    Preview 140711534
    Preview 140711537
    Preview 140711539
    Preview 140711542
    Preview 140790043

    Trigger: jack-o pose

    Full retrain of the jack-o pose LoRA, focused on the two weaknesses reported against v1: pose/style entanglement at high weight, and poor obedience to camera-angle instructions (especially anything other than a straight front shot).

    What changed under the hood

    • Trigger word now properly wired into the trainer, not just present in captions. This changes what the model learns from the 5% caption-dropout steps — instead of associating "no text" with the dataset's average look, those steps now reinforce the trigger phrase alone.

    • content_or_style: content — timestep sampling now favours the steps that encode structure and composition over the ones that encode surface texture. This is the main lever behind the reduced style bleed at high weight.

    • Horizontal flip augmentation enabled — the pose is left/right symmetric, so this doubled effective coverage for free.

    • Dataset grew from ~65 to 81 images, with additions targeted specifically at the angle/subject combinations that were thin or missing: true overhead shots, elevated three-quarter views, rear and rear-three-quarter angles at eye level and elevated height, and more non-female subjects (men, robots, androids, dolls, figurines).

    • Every caption rewritten to one consistent template — natural sentence, trigger phrase grammatically embedded, camera height and angle from a closed vocabulary, no pose anatomy in the text (that's the trigger's job now), no quality/style adjectives.

    • Full caption-accuracy audit before training — went back through the dataset image-by-image and corrected several front/rear mislabels, plus a handful of captions that had drifted onto the wrong image entirely after files got swapped during earlier dataset iterations.

    What to expect differently from v1

    • Style holds up better as you push weight toward 1.0 — medium (photo, anime, painting, product-shot) stays intact instead of collapsing toward the dataset's dominant studio-photo look.

    • Non-front camera angles are meaningfully more obedient, especially rear and rear-three-quarter at eye level and elevated height. Straight overhead is improved but still the weakest angle — it has the least training coverage of any camera position.

    • Non-human and male subjects hold the pose more reliably instead of drifting toward the dataset's dominant female anatomy.

    Recommended weight

    Still 0.6–0.8 for most prompts. If v1 needed 0.9–1.0 to lock the pose in on a hard prompt, try v2 at 0.7–0.8 first — the trigger binds harder now, so the same weight goes further.

    Changelog vs v1

    Training config

    • trigger_word: unset → jack-o pose

    • content_or_style: balancedcontent

    • flip_x: falsetrue

    Dataset

    • 65 → 81 images

    • Added: true overhead shots (3→8), elevated-height shots at side/rear azimuths (previously near-zero), additional male and non-human subjects (2 → 10+)

    • Camera-angle distribution rebalanced — front-heavy skew reduced from ~70% toward ~47% of the set

    Captions

    • Rewritten wholesale to a single consistent template (subject → trigger phrase → setting → camera height/angle → medium)

    • Removed all pose-anatomy descriptions from caption text (previously present in ~35% of captions, competing with the trigger for the pose concept)

    • Removed quality/style adjectives (polished, cinematic, dramatic, etc.) throughout

    • Corrected 6 front/rear/side mislabels found on manual re-verification

    • Corrected 5 captions that had become mismatched to the wrong image after dataset file swaps

    Known limitations carried over

    • Straight overhead remains the least-covered camera angle — expect more retries there than at any other position

    • Very high weight (0.9–1.0) on prompts stacking an unusual medium, unusual angle, and non-human subject simultaneously can still show minor style pull

    Example prompt

    (and you can see their in the WF, attached to this post):

    A woman with a short haircut, wearing a Stellar Blade cosplay costume, in a jack-o pose on the metal floor of a dimly lit underground command compartment; She turns her head toward the camera, smiling invitingly. The shot from behind is taken directly from the top-rear, overhead, full-length, a color photograph with cool blue-white lighting from above.
    image in cartoon style. A woman with a short haircut, wearing a Stellar Blade cosplay costume, in a jack-o pose on the metal floor of a dimly lit underground command compartment; She turns her head toward the camera, smiling invitingly. The shot is taken directly from the top three-auqrter angle, overhead, full-length, a color photograph with cool blue-white lighting from above.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (12)

    Nasse726Aug 24, 2026· 8 reactions
    CivitAI

    Can you please add at least one real prompt example?

    iodrg244Aug 24, 2026

    Agreed. I can't get a rear view no matter what I try. The images have a workflow but the workflow is some LLM generating thing so you don't actually see the prompt. Thanks fro the lora though. front facing works well.

    Nasse726Aug 24, 2026

    @iodrg244 it´s the rear view I waiting for :)

    kalavatz103
    Author
    Aug 25, 2026· 2 reactions

    Hello! you can use somethin like that: "Low-angle front perspective looking up at a model in a jack-o pose on an asphalt street. Oversized colorful windbreaker, neon sneakers, and baggy techwear cargo pants. Gritty urban backdrop with vibrant graffiti-covered walls, wide-angle lens distortion, dynamic street-style lighting, dramatic perspective, sharp details, modern streetwear magazine aesthetic.. Camera low angle, rear view. Body arched backward, legs extended wide, feet flat on floor. Spine curved, pelvis tilted upward."

    But whetewer, i planning update model today. Current dataset, i think, have too much front-view images..

    Nasse726Aug 25, 2026

    @kalavatz103 Waiting eagerly... your pose LoRAs are always exciting :)

    Nasse726Aug 25, 2026· 2 reactions

    @kalavatz103 and good choice..rear end are always more interessting :)

    kalavatz103
    Author
    Aug 25, 2026

    @Nasse726 you can try decrease strength lora to 0.7-0.8

    Nasse726Aug 25, 2026· 1 reaction

    @kalavatz103 Sry, I have got that far yet...I am in a trining session now, so at the moment its a big no no to render..i will try later tonite

    kalavatz103
    Author
    Aug 26, 2026· 1 reaction

    @Nasse726 

    Hello! im add new version of this lora and attached some promts. And you can see promts in the generated images attached to the post

    Nasse726Aug 26, 2026

    @kalavatz103 tonite is the night..I´ill get back to you..keep up the good work man

    williamja1969152Aug 26, 2026· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Sample prompts for the images you post are always appreciated by this community FYI

    kalavatz103
    Author
    Aug 26, 2026· 1 reaction

    Hello! im add new version of this lora and attached some promts. And you can see promts in the generated images attached to the post

    LORA
    Krea 2

    Details

    Downloads
    575
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    8/24/2026
    Updated
    8/29/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    Krea2_jackOpose8.safetensors

    Mirrors

    CivitAI (1 mirrors)