DO NOT USE THIS: SUPER OUTDATED - ONLY LEAVING IT UP FOR LEGACY PURPOSES.
Legacy Notes-
NOTE: This lora is best used for inpainting. Full body pictures will get morphed by the lora; will see if i can fix that in the future.
Note: @mods - these images are trained from publicly available images from online sources (ex. r/pussy, r/godpussy, r/porn, r/ etc, google images)
NOTE: Most likely culprit in the "big booty" effect is because my dumb azz forgot to add the tag/caption "cropped" in the dataset. Thats a huge blunder on my part because that tag is so important to cropped datasets. If you wish to refine the lora with the dataset or any dataset in the future with cropped pictures, make sure to add that important detail.
First attempt at a vagina Lora, but the real/main reason I uploaded this as it is, is because I wanted people that wanted to use the training data to be able to download it. Im always dissapointed when people upload checkpoints and the "VJJ" is unrealistic. This training data should make it easier for checkpoint trainers.
Use a lora strength of 0.3 or 0.2 for FULL BODY pics, and a higher strength for masked inpainting vagina region. Ive screwed up the training, so anything past 0.4 has a significant negative impact on the full body images. I want to upload this anyways because I have the training data attached if anyone wants to take a better shot at it feel free.
I Know there are plenty of vagina loras out there, but Ive always felt they were very inconsistent. 50% of the time you'd get a good realistic vagina, and sometimes you'd get a vagina that doesnt even look real. Im not sure, but I often think the inconsistency is due to their training data being small. So im my training data ive maxxed out the 1000 picture limit.
I dont know what others put in their training data, probably a small batch with very few positions. So I put every imaginable position in my training data. Its a training data with almost every imaginable angle; just trained on the wrong parameters. CivitAI used to have good lora training, but recently they nerfed it bad due to extreme traffic congestion and unable to keep up they lowered the Lora training parameters/quality. I used to be able to go up to 10 epocs, but that was nerfed, only could do 5 epochs with this lora.
I will retrain this in the future, but Im working on other things for now.
Description
NOTE: This lora is far from finished. The first iteration of this lora is simply to get the training data out there for people that are on the fence with lora training, gathering the data is the hardest part. The primary gem here is the training data, its taken me a hundred hours of work to gather up this data and crop them all. It should help others ease their suffering in future vagina Lora training endeavors.
Early alpha, use 0.3 strength for full body pics and higher for closeups/inpainting. Overtrained lora, I think 10k steps is far too many steps I think; may have cauased overfitting effect and network dimension: 32 was too low. I will retrain at less than 5k steps and 64 network dim on next attempt and see how it turns out. Unfortunately there is no "META" for training a lora, you just gotta gamble and experiment. I failed this time, will try again later.
FAQ
Comments (6)
Your training data is way to big, inconsistent and has many low quality images. Your tags are barebones at best. No tagging for lighting, medium, angles, position, oriantation, cropped, close up, etc. Quality always goes over quantity! You got 999 images and all are tagged with the exact same 6 words. No wonder this wont work. You should start from scratch, focus on quality and captions!
@fox23vang226 all right i get it. you have no clue what you do and still think you do good work XD delusional
@fox23vang226 I already told you what you are doing wrong! Your data set is crap! Noone can train a good Lora with that uncaptioned mess. If you had even the slightest idea what you were doing you wouldn't have 1000 inconsistent, low quality pictures.
QUALITY over quantity.
You will never get good results without putting in the work. Simple.
@fox23vang226 I'm just being honest. But if you believe honest criticism is disrespectful and rude then that says a lot about you. Not being able to accept criticism is immature, not being able to view your own work critically is immature, not being able to accept your own mistakes is immature, not being able to accept advice from more experienced people is immature. I don't know everything but I know cood captions are key. I know an inconsistent dataset of low quality images can't produce good quality Loras. I know quality goes over quantity. And I know there is a lot of educational material on this topic on GitHub, youtube, reddit, discord, etc. You claim nobody wants to help but the second I tell what you did wrong you get all bitchy and defensive. You said it yourself, you're too lazy.
Thank you for your kind and gracious feedback on my training data. I appreciate you pointing out the limitations of the current dataset, including the size, inconsistency, and lack of detailed tags. This dataset is still under development, and I understand the need for more diverse and informative tagging. I'm not actively working on expanding the dataset with higher quality images, and/or adding more granular tags. Ive posted it as a bare bones jump off point for anyone that wants to take an attempt at doing it better. Thus the bare bones dataset should cut down significantly on the hours needed to create a dataset of their own. I value your insights and will consider them when further developing my future training data sets.
https://colab.research.google.com/github/hollowstrawberry/kohya-colab/blob/main/Lora_Trainer.ipynb
Gives you more control over you training settings than Civit