Note: I don't plan on releasing another version of this model; there are already so many good photorealistic models out there, adding more just creates clutter! But I like having my own and I am putting this out there so other people can faithfully replicate any images that I create with it.
This pet project was my custom, mostly-photorealistic model, blended and fine-tuned on hand-captioned images of people, primarily from professional photo shoots. My goal was to create a model that generates beautiful images of people by default without needing excessive prompts, so that prompts can focus on adding qualities instead of removing defects.
When you're going for photographic images, you may wish to place "illustration" in the negative prompts. The following negative prompts are usually good: "3D digital illustration, blurry, low quality, grainy, pixelated" But remember to take "illustration" out of the negative prompt if you're going for art/anime/comic style results.
Description
This is a new merge/blend, attempting to produce better hands, faces, and anatomy in general.
FAQ
Comments (5)
This has fast become one of my favourite realistic models, thank you :)
Thank you!
Thank you for this amazing and highly underrated series of models!!
Do you have any tips for getting realistic, natural pubic hair with this model?
It seems less responsive to all of the usual prompt words, increasing weights, LORAs, never wanting to depict more than a neatly trimmed patch or landing strip.
Thank you for the kind words!
There's a classic LoRA entitled "That's my bush!" that works well. It can have some side-effects, though (if I recall correctly, girls tend to grin more with LoRA applied).
As far as correcting it through captioning alone... A lot of autotaggers (particularly WD14) mistakenly over-caption any suggestion of pubic hair in a training image, often with these three sets of tags: "pubic hair, female pubic hair, excessive pubic hair." I tried to fix this in my own training data, but when I was experimentally folding in other models I was more focused on the quality of faces and hands.
Wouldn't hurt to try those prompt inclusions and see if it helps!
In my opinion, this model is extremely underestimated. Having a very good photorealistic quality, it at the same time has excellent flexibility and versatility. I really liked the wide variety of faces and races, not being fixated on women and good anatomy. Cool job! Thanks!
Details
Files
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.