Professional Nude Photography
Tested at 0.7 with the GGUF FLUX Q-4_0 model
Fairly flexible at around 0.7-0.8 LORA value.
For 3D or other images it might be necessary to reduce the LORA value
Trained on female but not male anatomy genitalia etc.
Native generation at 1280x1536 appears to be higher quality.
Native generation at 1536x1920, somehow this didn't crash my 8GB video card
Description
FAQ
Comments (6)
I've just tested it with one of my standard prompts (LoRA strength 0.7). The nude anatomy was fine but in one of the four images of the batch the out of focus male was replaced by the same woman. This has never happend with with prompt with Flux and any of the multiple other nude LoRA I have tried so far.
I guess this training is missing regularization images or they weren't plenty enough.
Thanks,
Civitai's current setup doesn't allow for a regularization pass, at the moment they are training U-Net only as well.
It is possible that the Rank can be reduced further without loosing body details. I might try this with the later epochs if they did not overbake.
so far this seems better than the other nsfw Flux models. As noted in the description by Felldude, ethnicity can be a bit of an issue, but with the prohibitive cost of training on Flux it's not surprising. It's hit and mis if it works as intended, but so are all the other nsfw models
Thanks for the review. With it's unique TE FLUX is interesting, someone with access to a cluster of A100 could likely train (Finetune) the class tokens.
Thanks. I've accidentally dumped some non-nudes on your page (sorry), can you delete them from the page at your end?
@Stu42 The creator can limit content to SFW only but not limit post in other ways. I wouldn't want that responsibility anyway lol. (EDIT: Well you can block a user or hide content but I am not doing that)
Details
Files
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.