I already mentioned in each model, "it will not give you exactly what you are looking for". However, each model has been trained on it's own analog film image(s). You can tell from XL version(s). Despite the minor difference, you can tell, there are some difference.

It's hard telling difference between 250d and 500t in real life! (Or any other film stock) lol The trick is in amount of exposure affecting film color(s) + contrast + amount of noise/grain. Nothing else.

It's even harder for ai to differentiate it, but I'll keep updating the model(s) frequently till getting best possible outcome.

Even, if you compare digital film cameras, Arri, Red, Sony, Canon, Black Magic, etc. The difference is barley visible. But the trick is in how well the camera handles exposure + or -

@sevenof9247 Flux training takes hell of time, probably needs couple of epoch. XL on the other hand when pushed will show some better results but at the cost of noise and oversharpening images.

You can check FUJIFILM ETERNA v2 as an example, when compared to v1.

Maybe if fine tuned correct, might show better generated images.

Will have to try, but later.