PLEASE ADD YOUR IMAGES!
I created this model by mixing many different models from different sources. It took a long time to create the model, not being a professional, I did it by trial and error. I made the model for me and my friends and one day my friends told me to share my work on this site.
About the model.
This is a realistic model with a little touch of 3D from Pixar. It does quite well in a lot of different tasks, but it shows best in making images of people. Faces and bodies, including nudes, turn out very well from my point of view. I have used many different Lora's to generate images with my model, almost never had a problem. I used the following settings to get the best results - Sampling steps - 25, CFG Scale - 5, Sampling method - Euler. I also highly recommend to use Hires fix with upscaler ESRGAN_4x (hires steps - 25, Denoising strength - 0.3).
Some of the original models had a clear NSFW bias, because of this you can suddenly get an image of naked characters. To avoid this, write "nsfw, nudity" into the negative prompt.
The newer the version of the model, the more realism there is in it.
Description
Small but noticeable changes that make the model better.
FAQ
Comments (10)
That is a misleading description. At least based on all of examples, this is a cartoony model with a tiny bit of realistic. Very tiny. Looks much closer to an anime model.
I don't agree with you. This model is very strong in realism. Apparently you judge by my examples of images. The author of this model has very realistic images showing a good result with skin, eyes and hands. Try it yourself before you judge so categorically. I'm not insisting on anything, I just see that you judge only by the examples given. But the fact is that realism is not mine, I like fantasy more, but the choice fell on this model because of its very good result with hands and eyes. Good luck and have a nice day.
@speach1sdef178 Would be good to add realistic images that represent the title better.
@speach1sdef178 I will try it out for myself. Yes of course I judge it on the examples given, that is the point of the examples. If you state it is strong in realism but then every example given looks like a cartoon, then that defeats the purpose of posting examples. I am downloading it though and will see what it can do.
@speach1sdef178 After doing a little testing, it looks like the model is good when properly prompted and using a good sampler. I will post an example of one done right. If you want more people to be interested in it, you should post more examples that actually show what the model is capable of if you are going to call it realistic.
Hard disagree... you're blind
@chollman82141 The first post was 3 months ago on an much earlier version, which didn't look THAT realistic IMO. The newer versions look much better, which is cool, because different versions can still be used for specific effects. But as @Seeker70 also pointed out, prompting can make a huge difference.
Looking forward to trying the newer version!
Wait what? I don't get an anime style at all?
This is a reach, it's miles closer to realism than anime.
@SyntheticSunsets This was from 3 months ago. Go back and look at that one. Besides, something either looks real or not real. I am not concerned with "closer to." It looks like the newer versions have improved some. Based on the results shown in the gallery though, if it were my model, I would never make any claim to realism based on those images. Realism isn't what everyone is looking for though either, so that doesn't mean the model isn't good, just not good for the kind of images I look to create. Plenty of room for all kinds of models. I just don't like when people make claims they don't back up. If someone comes here looking for a model, they should be able to read the description and look at the example images and know what they are getting.
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.